blob: bdc2b41b31a2fe8c331b023a92678408d9e826f1 [file] [log] [blame]
/*
* Copyright (C) 2007 The Android Open Source Project
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
import dalvik.system.VMRuntime;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MINUTES;
/**
* Test a class with a bad finalizer.
*
* This test is inherently very slightly flaky. It assumes that the system will schedule the
* finalizer daemon and finalizer watchdog daemon soon and often enough to reach the timeout and
* throw the fatal exception before we time out. Since we build in a 100 second buffer, failures
* should be very rare.
*/
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
CountDownLatch finalizerWait = new CountDownLatch(1);
// A separate method to ensure no dex register keeps the object alive.
createBadFinalizer(finalizerWait);
// Should have at least two iterations to trigger finalization, but just to make sure run
// some more.
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
Runtime.getRuntime().gc();
}
// Now wait for the finalizer to start running. Give it a minute.
finalizerWait.await(1, MINUTES);
// Now fall asleep with a timeout. The timeout is large enough that we expect the
// finalizer daemon to have killed the process before the deadline elapses.
// The timeout is also large enough to cover the extra 5 seconds we wait
// to dump threads, plus potentially substantial gcstress overhead.
// Note: the timeout is here (instead of an infinite sleep) to protect the test
// environment (e.g., in case this is run without a timeout wrapper).
final long timeout = 100 * 1000 + VMRuntime.getRuntime().getFinalizerTimeoutMs();
long remainingWait = timeout;
final long waitStart = System.currentTimeMillis();
while (remainingWait > 0) {
synchronized (args) { // Just use an already existing object for simplicity...
try {
args.wait(remainingWait);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("UNEXPECTED EXCEPTION");
}
}
remainingWait = timeout - (System.currentTimeMillis() - waitStart);
}
// We should not get here.
System.out.println("UNREACHABLE");
System.exit(0);
}
private static void createBadFinalizer(CountDownLatch finalizerWait) {
BadFinalizer bf = new BadFinalizer(finalizerWait);
System.out.println("About to null reference.");
bf = null; // Not that this would make a difference, could be eliminated earlier.
}
public static void snooze(int ms) {
try {
Thread.sleep(ms);
} catch (InterruptedException ie) {
System.out.println("Unexpected interrupt");
}
}
/**
* Class with a bad finalizer.
*/
public static class BadFinalizer {
private CountDownLatch finalizerWait;
private volatile int j = 0; // Volatile in an effort to curb loop optimization.
public BadFinalizer(CountDownLatch finalizerWait) {
this.finalizerWait = finalizerWait;
}
protected void finalize() {
finalizerWait.countDown();
System.out.println("Finalizer started and sleeping briefly...");
long start, end;
start = System.nanoTime();
snooze(2000);
end = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("Finalizer done snoozing.");
System.out.println("Finalizer sleeping forever now.");
while (true) {
snooze(10000);
}
}
}
}