| /* |
| * Copyright (C) 2016 The Android Open Source Project |
| * |
| * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
| * You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| * |
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| * |
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| * limitations under the License. |
| */ |
| |
| #include "cha_guard_optimization.h" |
| |
| namespace art HIDDEN { |
| |
| // Note we can only do CHA guard elimination/motion in a single pass, since |
| // if a guard is not removed, another guard might be removed due to |
| // the existence of the first guard. The first guard should not be further |
| // removed in another pass. For example, due to further optimizations, |
| // a receiver of a guard might turn out to be a parameter value, or defined at |
| // a different site, which makes the guard removable as a result. However |
| // it's not safe to remove the guard in another pass since another guard might |
| // have been removed due to the existence of this guard. |
| // |
| // As a consequence, we decided not to rely on other passes to remove them |
| // (such as GVN or instruction simplifier). |
| |
| class CHAGuardVisitor : HGraphVisitor { |
| public: |
| explicit CHAGuardVisitor(HGraph* graph) |
| : HGraphVisitor(graph), |
| block_has_cha_guard_(GetGraph()->GetBlocks().size(), |
| 0, |
| graph->GetAllocator()->Adapter(kArenaAllocCHA)), |
| instruction_iterator_(nullptr) { |
| number_of_guards_to_visit_ = GetGraph()->GetNumberOfCHAGuards(); |
| DCHECK_NE(number_of_guards_to_visit_, 0u); |
| // Will recount number of guards during guard optimization. |
| GetGraph()->SetNumberOfCHAGuards(0); |
| } |
| |
| void VisitShouldDeoptimizeFlag(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag) override; |
| |
| void VisitBasicBlock(HBasicBlock* block) override; |
| |
| private: |
| void RemoveGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag); |
| // Return true if `flag` is removed. |
| bool OptimizeForParameter(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, HInstruction* receiver); |
| // Return true if `flag` is removed. |
| bool OptimizeWithDominatingGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, HInstruction* receiver); |
| // Return true if `flag` is hoisted. |
| bool HoistGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, HInstruction* receiver); |
| |
| // Record if each block has any CHA guard. It's updated during the |
| // reverse post order visit. Use int instead of bool since ArenaVector |
| // does not support bool. |
| ArenaVector<int> block_has_cha_guard_; |
| |
| // The iterator that's being used for this visitor. Need it to manually |
| // advance the iterator due to removing/moving more than one instruction. |
| HInstructionIterator* instruction_iterator_; |
| |
| // Used to short-circuit the pass when there is no more guards left to visit. |
| uint32_t number_of_guards_to_visit_; |
| |
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(CHAGuardVisitor); |
| }; |
| |
| void CHAGuardVisitor::VisitBasicBlock(HBasicBlock* block) { |
| if (number_of_guards_to_visit_ == 0) { |
| return; |
| } |
| // Skip phis, just iterate through instructions. |
| HInstructionIterator it(block->GetInstructions()); |
| instruction_iterator_ = ⁢ |
| for (; !it.Done(); it.Advance()) { |
| DCHECK(it.Current()->IsInBlock()); |
| it.Current()->Accept(this); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void CHAGuardVisitor::RemoveGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag) { |
| HBasicBlock* block = flag->GetBlock(); |
| HInstruction* compare = flag->GetNext(); |
| DCHECK(compare->IsNotEqual()); |
| HInstruction* deopt = compare->GetNext(); |
| DCHECK(deopt->IsDeoptimize()); |
| |
| // Advance instruction iterator first before we remove the guard. |
| // We need to do it twice since we remove three instructions and the |
| // visitor is responsible for advancing it once. |
| instruction_iterator_->Advance(); |
| instruction_iterator_->Advance(); |
| block->RemoveInstruction(deopt); |
| block->RemoveInstruction(compare); |
| block->RemoveInstruction(flag); |
| } |
| |
| bool CHAGuardVisitor::OptimizeForParameter(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, |
| HInstruction* receiver) { |
| // If some compiled code is invalidated by CHA due to class loading, the |
| // compiled code will not be entered anymore. So the very fact that the |
| // compiled code is invoked guarantees that a parameter receiver conforms |
| // to all the CHA devirtualization assumptions made by the compiled code, |
| // since all parameter receivers pre-exist any (potential) invalidation of |
| // the compiled code. |
| // |
| // TODO: allow more cases such as a phi whose inputs are all parameters. |
| if (receiver->IsParameterValue()) { |
| RemoveGuard(flag); |
| return true; |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| bool CHAGuardVisitor::OptimizeWithDominatingGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, |
| HInstruction* receiver) { |
| // If there is another guard that dominates the current guard, and |
| // that guard is dominated by receiver's definition, then the current |
| // guard can be eliminated, since receiver must pre-exist that other |
| // guard, and passing that guard guarantees that receiver conforms to |
| // all the CHA devirtualization assumptions. |
| HBasicBlock* dominator = flag->GetBlock(); |
| HBasicBlock* receiver_def_block = receiver->GetBlock(); |
| |
| // Complexity of the following algorithm: |
| // We potentially need to traverse the full dominator chain to receiver_def_block, |
| // plus a (partial) linear search within one block for each guard. |
| // So the worst case for each guard is bounded by the size of the |
| // biggest block plus the depth of the dominating tree. |
| |
| while (dominator != receiver_def_block) { |
| if (block_has_cha_guard_[dominator->GetBlockId()] == 1) { |
| RemoveGuard(flag); |
| return true; |
| } |
| dominator = dominator->GetDominator(); |
| } |
| |
| // At this point dominator is the block where receiver is defined. |
| // We do a linear search within dominator to see if there is a guard after |
| // receiver's definition. |
| HInstruction* instruction; |
| if (dominator == flag->GetBlock()) { |
| // Flag and receiver are defined in the same block. Search backward from |
| // the current guard. |
| instruction = flag->GetPrevious(); |
| } else { |
| // Search backward from the last instruction of that dominator. |
| instruction = dominator->GetLastInstruction(); |
| } |
| while (instruction != receiver) { |
| if (instruction == nullptr) { |
| // receiver must be defined in this block, we didn't find it |
| // in the instruction list, so it must be a Phi. |
| DCHECK(receiver->IsPhi()); |
| break; |
| } |
| if (instruction->IsShouldDeoptimizeFlag()) { |
| RemoveGuard(flag); |
| return true; |
| } |
| instruction = instruction->GetPrevious(); |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| bool CHAGuardVisitor::HoistGuard(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag, |
| HInstruction* receiver) { |
| // If receiver is loop invariant, we can hoist the guard out of the |
| // loop since passing a guard before entering the loop guarantees that |
| // receiver conforms to all the CHA devirtualization assumptions. |
| // We only hoist guards out of the inner loop since that offers most of the |
| // benefit and it might help remove other guards in the inner loop. |
| HBasicBlock* block = flag->GetBlock(); |
| HLoopInformation* loop_info = block->GetLoopInformation(); |
| if (loop_info != nullptr && |
| !loop_info->IsIrreducible() && |
| loop_info->IsDefinedOutOfTheLoop(receiver)) { |
| HInstruction* compare = flag->GetNext(); |
| DCHECK(compare->IsNotEqual()); |
| HInstruction* deopt = compare->GetNext(); |
| DCHECK(deopt->IsDeoptimize()); |
| |
| // Advance instruction iterator first before we move the guard. |
| // We need to do it twice since we move three instructions and the |
| // visitor is responsible for advancing it once. |
| instruction_iterator_->Advance(); |
| instruction_iterator_->Advance(); |
| |
| HBasicBlock* pre_header = loop_info->GetPreHeader(); |
| flag->MoveBefore(pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| compare->MoveBefore(pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| |
| block->RemoveInstruction(deopt); |
| HInstruction* suspend = loop_info->GetSuspendCheck(); |
| DCHECK(suspend != nullptr); |
| // Need a new deoptimize instruction that copies the environment |
| // of the suspend instruction for the loop. |
| HDeoptimize* deoptimize = new (GetGraph()->GetAllocator()) HDeoptimize( |
| GetGraph()->GetAllocator(), compare, DeoptimizationKind::kCHA, suspend->GetDexPc()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(deoptimize, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| deoptimize->CopyEnvironmentFromWithLoopPhiAdjustment( |
| suspend->GetEnvironment(), loop_info->GetHeader()); |
| block_has_cha_guard_[pre_header->GetBlockId()] = 1; |
| GetGraph()->IncrementNumberOfCHAGuards(); |
| return true; |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| void CHAGuardVisitor::VisitShouldDeoptimizeFlag(HShouldDeoptimizeFlag* flag) { |
| number_of_guards_to_visit_--; |
| HInstruction* receiver = flag->InputAt(0); |
| // Don't need the receiver anymore. |
| flag->RemoveInputAt(0); |
| if (receiver->IsNullCheck()) { |
| receiver = receiver->InputAt(0); |
| } |
| |
| if (OptimizeForParameter(flag, receiver)) { |
| DCHECK(!flag->IsInBlock()); |
| return; |
| } |
| if (OptimizeWithDominatingGuard(flag, receiver)) { |
| DCHECK(!flag->IsInBlock()); |
| return; |
| } |
| if (HoistGuard(flag, receiver)) { |
| DCHECK(flag->IsInBlock()); |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // Need to keep the CHA guard in place. |
| block_has_cha_guard_[flag->GetBlock()->GetBlockId()] = 1; |
| GetGraph()->IncrementNumberOfCHAGuards(); |
| } |
| |
| bool CHAGuardOptimization::Run() { |
| if (graph_->GetNumberOfCHAGuards() == 0) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| CHAGuardVisitor visitor(graph_); |
| for (HBasicBlock* block : graph_->GetReversePostOrder()) { |
| visitor.VisitBasicBlock(block); |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace art |