| Debugging hibernation and suspend |
| (C) 2007 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, GPL |
| |
| 1. Testing hibernation (aka suspend to disk or STD) |
| |
| To check if hibernation works, you can try to hibernate in the "reboot" mode: |
| |
| # echo reboot > /sys/power/disk |
| # echo disk > /sys/power/state |
| |
| and the system should create a hibernation image, reboot, resume and get back to |
| the command prompt where you have started the transition. If that happens, |
| hibernation is most likely to work correctly. Still, you need to repeat the |
| test at least a couple of times in a row for confidence. [This is necessary, |
| because some problems only show up on a second attempt at suspending and |
| resuming the system.] Moreover, hibernating in the "reboot" and "shutdown" |
| modes causes the PM core to skip some platform-related callbacks which on ACPI |
| systems might be necessary to make hibernation work. Thus, if your machine fails |
| to hibernate or resume in the "reboot" mode, you should try the "platform" mode: |
| |
| # echo platform > /sys/power/disk |
| # echo disk > /sys/power/state |
| |
| which is the default and recommended mode of hibernation. |
| |
| Unfortunately, the "platform" mode of hibernation does not work on some systems |
| with broken BIOSes. In such cases the "shutdown" mode of hibernation might |
| work: |
| |
| # echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk |
| # echo disk > /sys/power/state |
| |
| (it is similar to the "reboot" mode, but it requires you to press the power |
| button to make the system resume). |
| |
| If neither "platform" nor "shutdown" hibernation mode works, you will need to |
| identify what goes wrong. |
| |
| a) Test modes of hibernation |
| |
| To find out why hibernation fails on your system, you can use a special testing |
| facility available if the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG set. Then, |
| there is the file /sys/power/pm_test that can be used to make the hibernation |
| core run in a test mode. There are 5 test modes available: |
| |
| freezer |
| - test the freezing of processes |
| |
| devices |
| - test the freezing of processes and suspending of devices |
| |
| platform |
| - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices and platform |
| global control methods(*) |
| |
| processors |
| - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices, platform |
| global control methods(*) and the disabling of nonboot CPUs |
| |
| core |
| - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices, platform global |
| control methods(*), the disabling of nonboot CPUs and suspending of |
| platform/system devices |
| |
| (*) the platform global control methods are only available on ACPI systems |
| and are only tested if the hibernation mode is set to "platform" |
| |
| To use one of them it is necessary to write the corresponding string to |
| /sys/power/pm_test (eg. "devices" to test the freezing of processes and |
| suspending devices) and issue the standard hibernation commands. For example, |
| to use the "devices" test mode along with the "platform" mode of hibernation, |
| you should do the following: |
| |
| # echo devices > /sys/power/pm_test |
| # echo platform > /sys/power/disk |
| # echo disk > /sys/power/state |
| |
| Then, the kernel will try to freeze processes, suspend devices, wait a few |
| seconds (5 by default, but configurable by the suspend.pm_test_delay module |
| parameter), resume devices and thaw processes. If "platform" is written to |
| /sys/power/pm_test , then after suspending devices the kernel will additionally |
| invoke the global control methods (eg. ACPI global control methods) used to |
| prepare the platform firmware for hibernation. Next, it will wait a |
| configurable number of seconds and invoke the platform (eg. ACPI) global |
| methods used to cancel hibernation etc. |
| |
| Writing "none" to /sys/power/pm_test causes the kernel to switch to the normal |
| hibernation/suspend operations. Also, when open for reading, /sys/power/pm_test |
| contains a space-separated list of all available tests (including "none" that |
| represents the normal functionality) in which the current test level is |
| indicated by square brackets. |
| |
| Generally, as you can see, each test level is more "invasive" than the previous |
| one and the "core" level tests the hardware and drivers as deeply as possible |
| without creating a hibernation image. Obviously, if the "devices" test fails, |
| the "platform" test will fail as well and so on. Thus, as a rule of thumb, you |
| should try the test modes starting from "freezer", through "devices", "platform" |
| and "processors" up to "core" (repeat the test on each level a couple of times |
| to make sure that any random factors are avoided). |
| |
| If the "freezer" test fails, there is a task that cannot be frozen (in that case |
| it usually is possible to identify the offending task by analysing the output of |
| dmesg obtained after the failing test). Failure at this level usually means |
| that there is a problem with the tasks freezer subsystem that should be |
| reported. |
| |
| If the "devices" test fails, most likely there is a driver that cannot suspend |
| or resume its device (in the latter case the system may hang or become unstable |
| after the test, so please take that into consideration). To find this driver, |
| you can carry out a binary search according to the rules: |
| - if the test fails, unload a half of the drivers currently loaded and repeat |
| (that would probably involve rebooting the system, so always note what drivers |
| have been loaded before the test), |
| - if the test succeeds, load a half of the drivers you have unloaded most |
| recently and repeat. |
| |
| Once you have found the failing driver (there can be more than just one of |
| them), you have to unload it every time before hibernation. In that case please |
| make sure to report the problem with the driver. |
| |
| It is also possible that the "devices" test will still fail after you have |
| unloaded all modules. In that case, you may want to look in your kernel |
| configuration for the drivers that can be compiled as modules (and test again |
| with these drivers compiled as modules). You may also try to use some special |
| kernel command line options such as "noapic", "noacpi" or even "acpi=off". |
| |
| If the "platform" test fails, there is a problem with the handling of the |
| platform (eg. ACPI) firmware on your system. In that case the "platform" mode |
| of hibernation is not likely to work. You can try the "shutdown" mode, but that |
| is rather a poor man's workaround. |
| |
| If the "processors" test fails, the disabling/enabling of nonboot CPUs does not |
| work (of course, this only may be an issue on SMP systems) and the problem |
| should be reported. In that case you can also try to switch the nonboot CPUs |
| off and on using the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online sysfs attributes and |
| see if that works. |
| |
| If the "core" test fails, which means that suspending of the system/platform |
| devices has failed (these devices are suspended on one CPU with interrupts off), |
| the problem is most probably hardware-related and serious, so it should be |
| reported. |
| |
| A failure of any of the "platform", "processors" or "core" tests may cause your |
| system to hang or become unstable, so please beware. Such a failure usually |
| indicates a serious problem that very well may be related to the hardware, but |
| please report it anyway. |
| |
| b) Testing minimal configuration |
| |
| If all of the hibernation test modes work, you can boot the system with the |
| "init=/bin/bash" command line parameter and attempt to hibernate in the |
| "reboot", "shutdown" and "platform" modes. If that does not work, there |
| probably is a problem with a driver statically compiled into the kernel and you |
| can try to compile more drivers as modules, so that they can be tested |
| individually. Otherwise, there is a problem with a modular driver and you can |
| find it by loading a half of the modules you normally use and binary searching |
| in accordance with the algorithm: |
| - if there are n modules loaded and the attempt to suspend and resume fails, |
| unload n/2 of the modules and try again (that would probably involve rebooting |
| the system), |
| - if there are n modules loaded and the attempt to suspend and resume succeeds, |
| load n/2 modules more and try again. |
| |
| Again, if you find the offending module(s), it(they) must be unloaded every time |
| before hibernation, and please report the problem with it(them). |
| |
| c) Using the "test_resume" hibernation option |
| |
| /sys/power/disk generally tells the kernel what to do after creating a |
| hibernation image. One of the available options is "test_resume" which |
| causes the just created image to be used for immediate restoration. Namely, |
| after doing: |
| |
| # echo test_resume > /sys/power/disk |
| # echo disk > /sys/power/state |
| |
| a hibernation image will be created and a resume from it will be triggered |
| immediately without involving the platform firmware in any way. |
| |
| That test can be used to check if failures to resume from hibernation are |
| related to bad interactions with the platform firmware. That is, if the above |
| works every time, but resume from actual hibernation does not work or is |
| unreliable, the platform firmware may be responsible for the failures. |
| |
| On architectures and platforms that support using different kernels to restore |
| hibernation images (that is, the kernel used to read the image from storage and |
| load it into memory is different from the one included in the image) or support |
| kernel address space randomization, it also can be used to check if failures |
| to resume may be related to the differences between the restore and image |
| kernels. |
| |
| d) Advanced debugging |
| |
| In case that hibernation does not work on your system even in the minimal |
| configuration and compiling more drivers as modules is not practical or some |
| modules cannot be unloaded, you can use one of the more advanced debugging |
| techniques to find the problem. First, if there is a serial port in your box, |
| you can boot the kernel with the 'no_console_suspend' parameter and try to log |
| kernel messages using the serial console. This may provide you with some |
| information about the reasons of the suspend (resume) failure. Alternatively, |
| it may be possible to use a FireWire port for debugging with firescope |
| (http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/firescope/). On x86 it is also possible to |
| use the PM_TRACE mechanism documented in Documentation/power/s2ram.txt . |
| |
| 2. Testing suspend to RAM (STR) |
| |
| To verify that the STR works, it is generally more convenient to use the s2ram |
| tool available from http://suspend.sf.net and documented at |
| http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Suspend_to_RAM (S2RAM_LINK). |
| |
| Namely, after writing "freezer", "devices", "platform", "processors", or "core" |
| into /sys/power/pm_test (available if the kernel is compiled with |
| CONFIG_PM_DEBUG set) the suspend code will work in the test mode corresponding |
| to given string. The STR test modes are defined in the same way as for |
| hibernation, so please refer to Section 1 for more information about them. In |
| particular, the "core" test allows you to test everything except for the actual |
| invocation of the platform firmware in order to put the system into the sleep |
| state. |
| |
| Among other things, the testing with the help of /sys/power/pm_test may allow |
| you to identify drivers that fail to suspend or resume their devices. They |
| should be unloaded every time before an STR transition. |
| |
| Next, you can follow the instructions at S2RAM_LINK to test the system, but if |
| it does not work "out of the box", you may need to boot it with |
| "init=/bin/bash" and test s2ram in the minimal configuration. In that case, |
| you may be able to search for failing drivers by following the procedure |
| analogous to the one described in section 1. If you find some failing drivers, |
| you will have to unload them every time before an STR transition (ie. before |
| you run s2ram), and please report the problems with them. |
| |
| There is a debugfs entry which shows the suspend to RAM statistics. Here is an |
| example of its output. |
| # mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug |
| # cat /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_stats |
| success: 20 |
| fail: 5 |
| failed_freeze: 0 |
| failed_prepare: 0 |
| failed_suspend: 5 |
| failed_suspend_noirq: 0 |
| failed_resume: 0 |
| failed_resume_noirq: 0 |
| failures: |
| last_failed_dev: alarm |
| adc |
| last_failed_errno: -16 |
| -16 |
| last_failed_step: suspend |
| suspend |
| Field success means the success number of suspend to RAM, and field fail means |
| the failure number. Others are the failure number of different steps of suspend |
| to RAM. suspend_stats just lists the last 2 failed devices, error number and |
| failed step of suspend. |