| Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a CPU feature |
| which will be found on future Intel CPUs. |
| |
| Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing page-based |
| protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables |
| when an application changes protection domains. It works by |
| dedicating 4 previously ignored bits in each page table entry to a |
| "protection key", giving 16 possible keys. |
| |
| There is also a new user-accessible register (PKRU) with two separate |
| bits (Access Disable and Write Disable) for each key. Being a CPU |
| register, PKRU is inherently thread-local, potentially giving each |
| thread a different set of protections from every other thread. |
| |
| There are two new instructions (RDPKRU/WRPKRU) for reading and writing |
| to the new register. The feature is only available in 64-bit mode, |
| even though there is theoretically space in the PAE PTEs. These |
| permissions are enforced on data access only and have no effect on |
| instruction fetches. |
| |
| =========================== Syscalls =========================== |
| |
| There are 3 system calls which directly interact with pkeys: |
| |
| int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights) |
| int pkey_free(int pkey); |
| int pkey_mprotect(unsigned long start, size_t len, |
| unsigned long prot, int pkey); |
| |
| Before a pkey can be used, it must first be allocated with |
| pkey_alloc(). An application calls the WRPKRU instruction |
| directly in order to change access permissions to memory covered |
| with a key. In this example WRPKRU is wrapped by a C function |
| called pkey_set(). |
| |
| int real_prot = PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE; |
| pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE); |
| ptr = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); |
| ret = pkey_mprotect(ptr, PAGE_SIZE, real_prot, pkey); |
| ... application runs here |
| |
| Now, if the application needs to update the data at 'ptr', it can |
| gain access, do the update, then remove its write access: |
| |
| pkey_set(pkey, 0); // clear PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE |
| *ptr = foo; // assign something |
| pkey_set(pkey, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE); // set PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE again |
| |
| Now when it frees the memory, it will also free the pkey since it |
| is no longer in use: |
| |
| munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE); |
| pkey_free(pkey); |
| |
| (Note: pkey_set() is a wrapper for the RDPKRU and WRPKRU instructions. |
| An example implementation can be found in |
| tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c) |
| |
| =========================== Behavior =========================== |
| |
| The kernel attempts to make protection keys consistent with the |
| behavior of a plain mprotect(). For instance if you do this: |
| |
| mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_NONE); |
| something(ptr); |
| |
| you can expect the same effects with protection keys when doing this: |
| |
| pkey = pkey_alloc(0, PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE | PKEY_DISABLE_READ); |
| pkey_mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, pkey); |
| something(ptr); |
| |
| That should be true whether something() is a direct access to 'ptr' |
| like: |
| |
| *ptr = foo; |
| |
| or when the kernel does the access on the application's behalf like |
| with a read(): |
| |
| read(fd, ptr, 1); |
| |
| The kernel will send a SIGSEGV in both cases, but si_code will be set |
| to SEGV_PKERR when violating protection keys versus SEGV_ACCERR when |
| the plain mprotect() permissions are violated. |