| Deadline IO scheduler tunables |
| ============================== |
| |
| This little file attempts to document how the deadline io scheduler works. |
| In particular, it will clarify the meaning of the exposed tunables that may be |
| of interest to power users. |
| |
| Selecting IO schedulers |
| ----------------------- |
| Refer to Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt for information on |
| selecting an io scheduler on a per-device basis. |
| |
| |
| ******************************************************************************** |
| |
| |
| read_expire (in ms) |
| ----------- |
| |
| The goal of the deadline io scheduler is to attempt to guarantee a start |
| service time for a request. As we focus mainly on read latencies, this is |
| tunable. When a read request first enters the io scheduler, it is assigned |
| a deadline that is the current time + the read_expire value in units of |
| milliseconds. |
| |
| |
| write_expire (in ms) |
| ----------- |
| |
| Similar to read_expire mentioned above, but for writes. |
| |
| |
| fifo_batch (number of requests) |
| ---------- |
| |
| Requests are grouped into ``batches'' of a particular data direction (read or |
| write) which are serviced in increasing sector order. To limit extra seeking, |
| deadline expiries are only checked between batches. fifo_batch controls the |
| maximum number of requests per batch. |
| |
| This parameter tunes the balance between per-request latency and aggregate |
| throughput. When low latency is the primary concern, smaller is better (where |
| a value of 1 yields first-come first-served behaviour). Increasing fifo_batch |
| generally improves throughput, at the cost of latency variation. |
| |
| |
| writes_starved (number of dispatches) |
| -------------- |
| |
| When we have to move requests from the io scheduler queue to the block |
| device dispatch queue, we always give a preference to reads. However, we |
| don't want to starve writes indefinitely either. So writes_starved controls |
| how many times we give preference to reads over writes. When that has been |
| done writes_starved number of times, we dispatch some writes based on the |
| same criteria as reads. |
| |
| |
| front_merges (bool) |
| ------------ |
| |
| Sometimes it happens that a request enters the io scheduler that is contiguous |
| with a request that is already on the queue. Either it fits in the back of that |
| request, or it fits at the front. That is called either a back merge candidate |
| or a front merge candidate. Due to the way files are typically laid out, |
| back merges are much more common than front merges. For some work loads, you |
| may even know that it is a waste of time to spend any time attempting to |
| front merge requests. Setting front_merges to 0 disables this functionality. |
| Front merges may still occur due to the cached last_merge hint, but since |
| that comes at basically 0 cost we leave that on. We simply disable the |
| rbtree front sector lookup when the io scheduler merge function is called. |
| |
| |
| Nov 11 2002, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> |
| |
| |