| .. _securitybugs: |
| |
| Security bugs |
| ============= |
| |
| Linux kernel developers take security very seriously. As such, we'd |
| like to know when a security bug is found so that it can be fixed and |
| disclosed as quickly as possible. Please report security bugs to the |
| Linux kernel security team. |
| |
| Contact |
| ------- |
| |
| The Linux kernel security team can be contacted by email at |
| <security@kernel.org>. This is a private list of security officers |
| who will help verify the bug report and develop and release a fix. |
| If you already have a fix, please include it with your report, as |
| that can speed up the process considerably. It is possible that the |
| security team will bring in extra help from area maintainers to |
| understand and fix the security vulnerability. |
| |
| As it is with any bug, the more information provided the easier it |
| will be to diagnose and fix. Please review the procedure outlined in |
| admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst if you are unclear about what |
| information is helpful. Any exploit code is very helpful and will not |
| be released without consent from the reporter unless it has already been |
| made public. |
| |
| Disclosure |
| ---------- |
| |
| The goal of the Linux kernel security team is to work with the |
| bug submitter to bug resolution as well as disclosure. We prefer |
| to fully disclose the bug as soon as possible. It is reasonable to |
| delay disclosure when the bug or the fix is not yet fully understood, |
| the solution is not well-tested or for vendor coordination. However, we |
| expect these delays to be short, measurable in days, not weeks or months. |
| A disclosure date is negotiated by the security team working with the |
| bug submitter as well as vendors. However, the kernel security team |
| holds the final say when setting a disclosure date. The timeframe for |
| disclosure is from immediate (esp. if it's already publicly known) |
| to a few weeks. As a basic default policy, we expect report date to |
| disclosure date to be on the order of 7 days. |
| |
| Coordination with other groups |
| ------------------------------ |
| |
| The kernel security team strongly recommends that reporters of potential |
| security issues NEVER contact the "linux-distros" mailing list until |
| AFTER discussing it with the kernel security team. Do not Cc: both |
| lists at once. You may contact the linux-distros mailing list after a |
| fix has been agreed on and you fully understand the requirements that |
| doing so will impose on you and the kernel community. |
| |
| The different lists have different goals and the linux-distros rules do |
| not contribute to actually fixing any potential security problems. |
| |
| CVE assignment |
| -------------- |
| |
| The security team does not normally assign CVEs, nor do we require them |
| for reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and |
| may delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier |
| assigned ahead of public disclosure, they will need to contact the private |
| linux-distros list, described above. When such a CVE identifier is known |
| before a patch is provided, it is desirable to mention it in the commit |
| message, though. |
| |
| Non-disclosure agreements |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| The Linux kernel security team is not a formal body and therefore unable |
| to enter any non-disclosure agreements. |