diff options
| author | 2012-08-15 01:08:54 -0700 | |
|---|---|---|
| committer | 2012-08-15 01:16:16 -0700 | |
| commit | 01eb979243a57bd33f8389aeeade8024dd0258c0 (patch) | |
| tree | db1c8e4f388e2d904ae311a5ddca8e416fba9195 /services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp | |
| parent | ea599dfff03b45903dae3288274c31cb24fd483f (diff) | |
Fix layer removal transaction.
Layers were not properly being removed because we were
setting the wrong transaction type flag at the time of
removal.
When layers are removed, we must use eDisplayTransactionNeeded,
not eTransactionNeeded, to ensure that the mLayersRemoved
flag is checked and the appropriate cleanup occurs.
Bug: 6970310
Change-Id: Id4b2897a34d4ac00aa0f92349c0ec6db95c1aaf7
Diffstat (limited to 'services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp b/services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp index 3a802ff802..97b02ce600 100644 --- a/services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp +++ b/services/surfaceflinger/SurfaceFlinger.cpp @@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ status_t SurfaceFlinger::removeLayer(const sp<LayerBase>& layer) Mutex::Autolock _l(mStateLock); status_t err = purgatorizeLayer_l(layer); if (err == NO_ERROR) - setTransactionFlags(eTransactionNeeded); + setTransactionFlags(eDisplayTransactionNeeded); return err; } @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ status_t SurfaceFlinger::onLayerRemoved(const sp<Client>& client, SurfaceID sid) if (layer != 0) { err = purgatorizeLayer_l(layer); if (err == NO_ERROR) { - setTransactionFlags(eTransactionNeeded); + setTransactionFlags(eDisplayTransactionNeeded); } } return err; |