summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--services/core/java/com/android/server/policy/PhoneWindowManager.java2
-rw-r--r--services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/WindowManagerService.java14
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/policy/PhoneWindowManager.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/policy/PhoneWindowManager.java
index 0b07902eb440..6295630a7a8e 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/policy/PhoneWindowManager.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/policy/PhoneWindowManager.java
@@ -7758,7 +7758,7 @@ public class PhoneWindowManager implements WindowManagerPolicy {
// it and is in the fullscreen opaque state. Seamless rotation
// requires freezing various Surface states and won't work well
// with animations, so we disable it in the animation case for now.
- if (w != null && mTopIsFullscreen && !w.isAnimatingLw() &&
+ if (w != null && !w.isAnimatingLw() &&
((w.getAttrs().rotationAnimation == ROTATION_ANIMATION_JUMPCUT) ||
(w.getAttrs().rotationAnimation == ROTATION_ANIMATION_SEAMLESS))) {
return true;
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/WindowManagerService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/WindowManagerService.java
index 6fdfaa25e14e..c0b2d336b33c 100644
--- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/WindowManagerService.java
+++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/WindowManagerService.java
@@ -6772,6 +6772,20 @@ public class WindowManagerService extends IWindowManager.Stub
rotateSeamlessly = false;
break;
}
+ // In what can only be called an unfortunate workaround we require
+ // seamlessly rotated child windows to have the TRANSFORM_TO_DISPLAY_INVERSE
+ // flag. Due to limitations in the client API, there is no way for
+ // the client to set this flag in a race free fashion. If we seamlessly rotate
+ // a window which does not have this flag, but then gains it, we will get
+ // an incorrect visual result (rotated viewfinder). This means if we want to
+ // support seamlessly rotating windows which could gain this flag, we can't
+ // rotate windows without it. This limits seamless rotation in N to camera framework
+ // users, windows without children, and native code. This is unfortunate but
+ // having the camera work is our primary goal.
+ if (w.isChildWindow() & w.isVisibleNow() &&
+ !w.mWinAnimator.mSurfaceController.getTransformToDisplayInverse()) {
+ rotateSeamlessly = false;
+ }
}
}