diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoInputStream.java | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoOutputStream.java | 8 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoInputStream.java b/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoInputStream.java index cbe3734ce5fa..aa70d07ff787 100644 --- a/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoInputStream.java +++ b/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoInputStream.java @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ public final class ProtoInputStream extends ProtoStream { private byte mState = 0; /** - * Keeps track of the currently read nested Objects, for end object sanity checking and debug + * Keeps track of the currently read nested Objects, for end object checking and debug */ private ArrayList<Long> mExpectedObjectTokenStack = null; @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ public final class ProtoInputStream extends ProtoStream { (int) fieldId, getOffset() + messageSize)); } - // Sanity check + // Validation check if (mDepth > 0 && getOffsetFromToken(mExpectedObjectTokenStack.get(mDepth)) > getOffsetFromToken(mExpectedObjectTokenStack.get(mDepth - 1))) { @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ public final class ProtoInputStream extends ProtoStream { * @param token - token */ public void end(long token) { - // Sanity check to make sure user is keeping track of their embedded messages + // Make sure user is keeping track of their embedded messages if (mExpectedObjectTokenStack.get(mDepth) != token) { throw new ProtoParseException( "end token " + token + " does not match current message token " diff --git a/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoOutputStream.java b/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoOutputStream.java index 5fcd38e2fd9c..afca4ab2c741 100644 --- a/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoOutputStream.java +++ b/core/java/android/util/proto/ProtoOutputStream.java @@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ import java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException; * cache the size, and then write the size-prefixed buffers. * * We are trying to avoid too much generated code here, but this class still - * needs to have a somewhat sane API. We can't have the multiple passes be - * done by the calling code. In addition, we want to avoid the memory high - * water mark of duplicating all of the values into the traditional in-memory - * Message objects. We need to find another way. + * needs to have API. We can't have the multiple passes be done by the + * calling code. In addition, we want to avoid the memory high water mark + * of duplicating all of the values into the traditional in-memory Message + * objects. We need to find another way. * * So what we do here is to let the calling code write the data into a * byte[] (actually a collection of them wrapped in the EncodedBuffer class), |