summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--core/java/android/app/admin/DevicePolicyManager.java12
-rw-r--r--services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java87
-rw-r--r--services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerTest.java253
3 files changed, 132 insertions, 220 deletions
diff --git a/core/java/android/app/admin/DevicePolicyManager.java b/core/java/android/app/admin/DevicePolicyManager.java
index 2aac94c6f5da..714dc50fb316 100644
--- a/core/java/android/app/admin/DevicePolicyManager.java
+++ b/core/java/android/app/admin/DevicePolicyManager.java
@@ -1942,16 +1942,6 @@ public class DevicePolicyManager {
public static final int CODE_SPLIT_SYSTEM_USER_DEVICE_SYSTEM_USER = 14;
/**
- * Result code for {@link #checkProvisioningPreCondition}.
- *
- * <p>Returned for {@link #ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE} when adding a managed profile is
- * disallowed by {@link UserManager#DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE}.
- *
- * @hide
- */
- public static final int CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED = 15;
-
- /**
* Result codes for {@link #checkProvisioningPreCondition} indicating all the provisioning pre
* conditions.
*
@@ -1963,7 +1953,7 @@ public class DevicePolicyManager {
CODE_USER_SETUP_COMPLETED, CODE_NOT_SYSTEM_USER, CODE_HAS_PAIRED,
CODE_MANAGED_USERS_NOT_SUPPORTED, CODE_SYSTEM_USER, CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE,
CODE_NOT_SYSTEM_USER_SPLIT, CODE_DEVICE_ADMIN_NOT_SUPPORTED,
- CODE_SPLIT_SYSTEM_USER_DEVICE_SYSTEM_USER, CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED
+ CODE_SPLIT_SYSTEM_USER_DEVICE_SYSTEM_USER
})
public @interface ProvisioningPreCondition {}
diff --git a/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java b/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java
index 2a08f5c2de12..bc4604ef5ad0 100644
--- a/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java
+++ b/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ import static android.app.ActivityManager.LOCK_TASK_MODE_NONE;
import static android.app.admin.DeviceAdminReceiver.EXTRA_TRANSFER_OWNERSHIP_ADMIN_EXTRAS_BUNDLE;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_USER;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.CODE_ACCOUNTS_NOT_EMPTY;
-import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.CODE_DEVICE_ADMIN_NOT_SUPPORTED;
import static android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager.CODE_HAS_DEVICE_OWNER;
@@ -4099,6 +4098,12 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager {
if (mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_USER, userHandle)) {
mUserManager.setUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_USER, false, userHandle);
}
+ // When a device owner is set, the system automatically restricts adding a managed profile.
+ // Remove this restriction when the device owner is cleared.
+ if (mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE, userHandle)) {
+ mUserManager.setUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE, false,
+ userHandle);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -7976,10 +7981,19 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager {
updateDeviceOwnerLocked();
setDeviceOwnerSystemPropertyLocked();
- // TODO Send to system too?
- mInjector.binderWithCleanCallingIdentity(
- () -> sendOwnerChangedBroadcast(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_DEVICE_OWNER_CHANGED,
- userId));
+ mInjector.binderWithCleanCallingIdentity(() -> {
+ // Restrict adding a managed profile when a device owner is set on the device.
+ // That is to prevent the co-existence of a managed profile and a device owner
+ // on the same device.
+ // Instead, the device may be provisioned with an organization-owned managed
+ // profile, such that the admin on that managed profile has extended management
+ // capabilities that can affect the entire device (but not access private data
+ // on the primary profile).
+ mUserManager.setUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE, true,
+ UserHandle.of(userId));
+ // TODO Send to system too?
+ sendOwnerChangedBroadcast(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_DEVICE_OWNER_CHANGED, userId);
+ });
mDeviceAdminServiceController.startServiceForOwner(
admin.getPackageName(), userId, "set-device-owner");
@@ -8234,6 +8248,17 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Not active admin: " + who);
}
+ UserInfo parentUser = mUserManager.getProfileParent(userHandle);
+ // When trying to set a profile owner on a new user, it may be that this user is
+ // a profile - but it may not be a managed profile if there's a restriction on the
+ // parent to add managed profiles (e.g. if the device has a device owner).
+ if (parentUser != null && mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(
+ UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE,
+ UserHandle.of(parentUser.id))) {
+ Slog.i(LOG_TAG, "Cannot set profile owner because of restriction.");
+ return false;
+ }
+
if (isAdb()) {
// Log profile owner provisioning was started using adb.
MetricsLogger.action(mContext, PROVISIONING_ENTRY_POINT_ADB, LOG_TAG_PROFILE_OWNER);
@@ -12293,25 +12318,41 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager {
final long ident = mInjector.binderClearCallingIdentity();
try {
final UserHandle callingUserHandle = UserHandle.of(callingUserId);
- final ComponentName ownerAdmin = getOwnerComponent(packageName, callingUserId);
- if (mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- callingUserHandle)) {
- // An admin can initiate provisioning if it has set the restriction.
- if (ownerAdmin == null || isAdminAffectedByRestriction(ownerAdmin,
- UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE, callingUserId)) {
- return CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED;
- }
- }
- boolean canRemoveProfile = true;
- if (mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_REMOVE_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- callingUserHandle)) {
- // We can remove a profile if the admin itself has set the restriction.
- if (ownerAdmin == null || isAdminAffectedByRestriction(ownerAdmin,
- UserManager.DISALLOW_REMOVE_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- callingUserId)) {
- canRemoveProfile = false;
- }
+ final boolean hasDeviceOwner;
+ synchronized (getLockObject()) {
+ hasDeviceOwner = getDeviceOwnerAdminLocked() != null;
+ }
+
+ final boolean addingProfileRestricted = mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(
+ UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE, callingUserHandle);
+
+ UserInfo parentUser = mUserManager.getProfileParent(callingUserId);
+ final boolean addingProfileRestrictedOnParent = (parentUser != null)
+ && mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(
+ UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE,
+ UserHandle.of(parentUser.id));
+
+ Slog.i(LOG_TAG, String.format(
+ "When checking for managed profile provisioning: Has device owner? %b, adding"
+ + " profile restricted? %b, adding profile restricted on parent? %b",
+ hasDeviceOwner, addingProfileRestricted, addingProfileRestrictedOnParent));
+
+ // If there's a device owner, the restriction on adding a managed profile must be set
+ // somewhere.
+ if (hasDeviceOwner && !addingProfileRestricted && !addingProfileRestrictedOnParent) {
+ Slog.wtf(LOG_TAG, "Has a device owner but no restriction on adding a profile.");
+ }
+
+ // Do not allow adding a managed profile if there's a restriction, either on the current
+ // user or its parent user.
+ if (addingProfileRestricted || addingProfileRestrictedOnParent) {
+ return CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE;
}
+ // If there's a restriction on removing the managed profile then we have to take it
+ // into account when checking whether more profiles can be added.
+ boolean canRemoveProfile =
+ !mUserManager.hasUserRestriction(UserManager.DISALLOW_REMOVE_MANAGED_PROFILE,
+ callingUserHandle);
if (!mUserManager.canAddMoreManagedProfiles(callingUserId, canRemoveProfile)) {
return CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE;
}
diff --git a/services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerTest.java b/services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerTest.java
index 175c7565a005..354367465606 100644
--- a/services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerTest.java
+++ b/services/tests/servicestests/src/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerTest.java
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ import static com.android.internal.widget.LockPatternUtils.EscrowTokenStateChang
import static com.android.server.testutils.TestUtils.assertExpectException;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.any;
+import static org.mockito.Matchers.anyBoolean;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.anyInt;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.anyLong;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.anyObject;
@@ -272,6 +273,29 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
}).when(getServices().userManager).getApplicationRestrictions(
anyString(), any(UserHandle.class));
+ // Emulate UserManager.setUserRestriction/getUserRestrictions
+ final Map<UserHandle, Bundle> userRestrictions = new HashMap<>();
+
+ doAnswer((Answer<Void>) invocation -> {
+ String key = (String) invocation.getArguments()[0];
+ boolean value = (Boolean) invocation.getArguments()[1];
+ UserHandle user = (UserHandle) invocation.getArguments()[2];
+ Bundle userBundle = userRestrictions.getOrDefault(user, new Bundle());
+ userBundle.putBoolean(key, value);
+
+ userRestrictions.put(user, userBundle);
+ return null;
+ }).when(getServices().userManager).setUserRestriction(
+ anyString(), anyBoolean(), any(UserHandle.class));
+
+ doAnswer((Answer<Boolean>) invocation -> {
+ String key = (String) invocation.getArguments()[0];
+ UserHandle user = (UserHandle) invocation.getArguments()[1];
+ Bundle userBundle = userRestrictions.getOrDefault(user, new Bundle());
+ return userBundle.getBoolean(key);
+ }).when(getServices().userManager).hasUserRestriction(
+ anyString(), any(UserHandle.class));
+
// Add the first secondary user.
getServices().addUser(DpmMockContext.CALLER_USER_HANDLE, 0,
UserManager.USER_TYPE_FULL_SECONDARY);
@@ -819,10 +843,8 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
final int MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID =
UserHandle.getUid(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, DpmMockContext.SYSTEM_UID);
- // Setup device owner.
mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.SYSTEM_UID;
mContext.packageName = admin1.getPackageName();
- setupDeviceOwner();
// Add a managed profile belonging to the system user.
addManagedProfile(admin1, MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, admin1);
@@ -830,18 +852,13 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
// Change the parent user's password.
dpm.reportPasswordChanged(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM);
- // Both the device owner and the managed profile owner should receive this broadcast.
+ // The managed profile owner should receive this broadcast.
final Intent intent = new Intent(DeviceAdminReceiver.ACTION_PASSWORD_CHANGED);
intent.setComponent(admin1);
intent.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_USER, UserHandle.of(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM));
verify(mContext.spiedContext, times(1)).sendBroadcastAsUser(
MockUtils.checkIntent(intent),
- MockUtils.checkUserHandle(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM),
- eq(null),
- any(Bundle.class));
- verify(mContext.spiedContext, times(1)).sendBroadcastAsUser(
- MockUtils.checkIntent(intent),
MockUtils.checkUserHandle(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID),
eq(null),
any(Bundle.class));
@@ -861,12 +878,11 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
final int MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID =
UserHandle.getUid(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, DpmMockContext.SYSTEM_UID);
- // Setup device owner.
+ // Configure system as having separate profile challenge.
mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.SYSTEM_UID;
mContext.packageName = admin1.getPackageName();
doReturn(true).when(getServices().lockPatternUtils)
.isSeparateProfileChallengeEnabled(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID);
- setupDeviceOwner();
// Add a managed profile belonging to the system user.
addManagedProfile(admin1, MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, admin1);
@@ -951,6 +967,10 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
verify(getServices().iactivityManager, times(1)).updateDeviceOwner(
eq(admin1.getPackageName()));
+ verify(getServices().userManager, times(1)).setUserRestriction(
+ eq(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE),
+ eq(true), eq(UserHandle.SYSTEM));
+
verify(mContext.spiedContext, times(1)).sendBroadcastAsUser(
MockUtils.checkIntentAction(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_DEVICE_OWNER_CHANGED),
MockUtils.checkUserHandle(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM));
@@ -2002,12 +2022,11 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
assertNoDeviceOwnerRestrictions();
- // Initialize DPMS again and check that the user restriction wasn't enabled again.
reset(getServices().userManagerInternal);
- initializeDpms();
- assertTrue(dpm.isDeviceOwnerApp(admin1.getPackageName()));
- assertNotNull(dpms.getDeviceOwnerAdminLocked());
+ // Ensure the DISALLOW_REMOVE_MANAGED_PROFILES restriction doesn't show up as a
+ // restriction to the device owner.
+ dpm.addUserRestriction(admin1, UserManager.DISALLOW_REMOVE_MANAGED_PROFILE);
assertNoDeviceOwnerRestrictions();
}
@@ -2981,7 +3000,6 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
setup_nonSplitUser_withDo_primaryUser();
final int MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID = 18;
final int MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID = UserHandle.getUid(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, 1308);
- addManagedProfile(admin1, MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, admin1);
when(getServices().userManager.canAddMoreManagedProfiles(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM,
false /* we can't remove a managed profile */)).thenReturn(false);
when(getServices().userManager.canAddMoreManagedProfiles(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM,
@@ -3026,41 +3044,16 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
DevicePolicyManager.CODE_HAS_DEVICE_OWNER);
assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_DEVICE, false);
- // COMP mode is allowed.
+ // COMP mode NOT is allowed.
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
+ assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false);
- // And other DPCs can also provision a managed profile (DO + BYOD case).
+ // And other DPCs can NOT provision a managed profile.
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(
DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true,
- DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME, DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_UID);
- }
-
- public void testProvisioning_nonSplitUser_withDo_primaryUser_restrictedByDo() throws Exception {
- setup_nonSplitUser_withDo_primaryUser();
- mContext.packageName = admin1.getPackageName();
- mContext.callerPermissions.add(permission.MANAGE_PROFILE_AND_DEVICE_OWNERS);
- // The DO should be allowed to initiate provisioning if it set the restriction itself, but
- // other packages should be forbidden.
- when(getServices().userManager.hasUserRestriction(
- eq(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE),
- eq(UserHandle.getUserHandleForUid(mContext.binder.callingUid))))
- .thenReturn(true);
- when(getServices().userManager.getUserRestrictionSource(
- eq(UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE),
- eq(UserHandle.getUserHandleForUid(mContext.binder.callingUid))))
- .thenReturn(UserManager.RESTRICTION_SOURCE_DEVICE_OWNER);
- assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true);
- assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(
- DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false,
DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME, DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_UID);
}
@@ -3081,31 +3074,46 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
eq(UserHandle.getUserHandleForUid(mContext.binder.callingUid))))
.thenReturn(UserManager.RESTRICTION_SOURCE_SYSTEM);
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false);
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(
DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE_DISALLOWED);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false,
DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME, DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_UID);
}
- public void testCheckProvisioningPreCondition_nonSplitUser_comp() throws Exception {
+ public void testCheckCannotSetProfileOwnerWithDeviceOwner() throws Exception {
+ setup_nonSplitUser_withDo_primaryUser();
+ final int managedProfileUserId = 18;
+ final int managedProfileAdminUid = UserHandle.getUid(managedProfileUserId, 1308);
+
+ final int userId = UserHandle.getUserId(managedProfileAdminUid);
+ getServices().addUser(userId, 0, UserManager.USER_TYPE_PROFILE_MANAGED,
+ UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM);
+ mContext.callerPermissions.addAll(OWNER_SETUP_PERMISSIONS);
+ setUpPackageManagerForFakeAdmin(admin1, managedProfileAdminUid, admin1);
+ dpm.setActiveAdmin(admin1, false, userId);
+ assertFalse(dpm.setProfileOwner(admin1, null, userId));
+ mContext.callerPermissions.removeAll(OWNER_SETUP_PERMISSIONS);
+ }
+
+ public void testCheckProvisioningPreCondition_nonSplitUser_attemptingComp() throws Exception {
setup_nonSplitUser_withDo_primaryUser_ManagedProfile();
mContext.packageName = admin1.getPackageName();
mContext.callerPermissions.add(permission.MANAGE_PROFILE_AND_DEVICE_OWNERS);
// We can delete the managed profile to create a new one, so provisioning is allowed.
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
+ assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false);
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(
DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true,
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
+ assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false,
DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_PACKAGE_NAME, DpmMockContext.ANOTHER_UID);
}
@@ -3133,8 +3141,8 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
// But the device owner can still do it because it has set the restriction itself.
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
+ assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false);
}
private void setup_splitUser_firstBoot_systemUser() throws Exception {
@@ -3329,6 +3337,8 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
when(getServices().ipackageManager.hasSystemFeature(PackageManager.FEATURE_MANAGED_USERS, 0))
.thenReturn(true);
when(getServices().userManagerForMock.isSplitSystemUser()).thenReturn(true);
+ when(getServices().userManager.getProfileParent(DpmMockContext.CALLER_USER_HANDLE))
+ .thenReturn(new UserInfo(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM, "user system", 0));
when(getServices().userManager.canAddMoreManagedProfiles(DpmMockContext.CALLER_USER_HANDLE,
true)).thenReturn(true);
setUserSetupCompleteForUser(false, DpmMockContext.CALLER_USER_HANDLE);
@@ -3341,7 +3351,7 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
setup_provisionManagedProfileWithDeviceOwner_primaryUser();
setUpPackageManagerForAdmin(admin1, mContext.binder.callingUid);
mContext.packageName = admin1.getPackageName();
- assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, true);
+ assertProvisioningAllowed(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE, false);
}
public void testCheckProvisioningPreCondition_provisionManagedProfileWithDeviceOwner_primaryUser()
@@ -3349,9 +3359,9 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
setup_provisionManagedProfileWithDeviceOwner_primaryUser();
mContext.callerPermissions.add(permission.MANAGE_PROFILE_AND_DEVICE_OWNERS);
- // COMP mode is allowed.
+ // COMP mode is NOT allowed.
assertCheckProvisioningPreCondition(DevicePolicyManager.ACTION_PROVISION_MANAGED_PROFILE,
- DevicePolicyManager.CODE_OK);
+ DevicePolicyManager.CODE_CANNOT_ADD_MANAGED_PROFILE);
}
private void setup_provisionManagedProfileCantRemoveUser_primaryUser() throws Exception {
@@ -3868,11 +3878,6 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
List<UserHandle> targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(admin1);
MoreAsserts.assertEmpty(targetUsers);
- // Setup a managed profile managed by the same admin.
- final int MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID = 15;
- final int MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID = UserHandle.getUid(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, 20456);
- addManagedProfile(admin1, MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, admin1);
-
// Add a secondary user, it should never talk with.
final int ANOTHER_USER_ID = 36;
getServices().addUser(ANOTHER_USER_ID, 0, UserManager.USER_TYPE_FULL_SECONDARY);
@@ -3882,30 +3887,11 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(admin1);
MoreAsserts.assertEmpty(targetUsers);
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(admin1);
- MoreAsserts.assertEmpty(targetUsers);
-
// Setting affiliation ids
final Set<String> userAffiliationIds = Collections.singleton("some.affiliation-id");
mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
dpm.setAffiliationIds(admin1, userAffiliationIds);
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- dpm.setAffiliationIds(admin1, userAffiliationIds);
-
- // Calling from device owner admin, the result list should just contain the managed
- // profile user id.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
- targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(admin1);
- MoreAsserts.assertContentsInAnyOrder(targetUsers, UserHandle.of(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID));
-
- // Calling from managed profile admin, the result list should just contain the system
- // user id.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(admin1);
- MoreAsserts.assertContentsInAnyOrder(targetUsers, UserHandle.SYSTEM);
-
// Changing affiliation ids in one
dpm.setAffiliationIds(admin1, Collections.singleton("some-different-affiliation-id"));
@@ -3919,38 +3905,6 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
MoreAsserts.assertEmpty(targetUsers);
}
- public void testGetBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers_differentPackage() throws Exception {
- // Setup a device owner.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
- setupDeviceOwner();
-
- // Set up a managed profile managed by different package.
- final int MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID = 15;
- final int MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID = UserHandle.getUid(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, 20456);
- final ComponentName adminDifferentPackage =
- new ComponentName("another.package", "whatever.class");
- addManagedProfile(adminDifferentPackage, MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, admin2);
-
- // Setting affiliation ids
- final Set<String> userAffiliationIds = Collections.singleton("some-affiliation-id");
- dpm.setAffiliationIds(admin1, userAffiliationIds);
-
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- dpm.setAffiliationIds(adminDifferentPackage, userAffiliationIds);
-
- // Calling from device owner admin, we should get zero bind device admin target users as
- // their packages are different.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
- List<UserHandle> targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(admin1);
- MoreAsserts.assertEmpty(targetUsers);
-
- // Calling from managed profile admin, we should still get zero target users for the same
- // reason.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- targetUsers = dpm.getBindDeviceAdminTargetUsers(adminDifferentPackage);
- MoreAsserts.assertEmpty(targetUsers);
- }
-
private void verifyLockTaskState(int userId) throws Exception {
verifyLockTaskState(userId, new String[0],
DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_GLOBAL_ACTIONS);
@@ -3987,79 +3941,6 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerTest extends DpmTestBase {
() -> dpm.setLockTaskFeatures(who, flags));
}
- public void testLockTaskPolicyAllowedForAffiliatedUsers() throws Exception {
- // Setup a device owner.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
- setupDeviceOwner();
- // Lock task policy is updated when loading user data.
- verifyLockTaskState(UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM);
-
- // Set up a managed profile managed by different package (package name shouldn't matter)
- final int MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID = 15;
- final int MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID = UserHandle.getUid(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, 20456);
- final ComponentName adminDifferentPackage =
- new ComponentName("another.package", "whatever.class");
- addManagedProfile(adminDifferentPackage, MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, admin2);
- verifyLockTaskState(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID);
-
- // Setup a PO on the secondary user
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_UID;
- setAsProfileOwner(admin3);
- verifyLockTaskState(DpmMockContext.CALLER_USER_HANDLE);
-
- // The DO can still set lock task packages
- final String[] doPackages = {"doPackage1", "doPackage2"};
- final int flags = DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_NOTIFICATIONS
- | DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_HOME
- | DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_OVERVIEW;
- verifyCanSetLockTask(DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID, UserHandle.USER_SYSTEM, admin1, doPackages, flags);
-
- final String[] secondaryPoPackages = {"secondaryPoPackage1", "secondaryPoPackage2"};
- final int secondaryPoFlags = DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_NOTIFICATIONS
- | DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_HOME
- | DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_OVERVIEW;
- verifyCanNotSetLockTask(DpmMockContext.CALLER_UID, admin3, secondaryPoPackages, secondaryPoFlags);
-
- // Managed profile is unaffiliated - shouldn't be able to setLockTaskPackages.
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- final String[] poPackages = {"poPackage1", "poPackage2"};
- final int poFlags = DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_NOTIFICATIONS
- | DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_HOME
- | DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_OVERVIEW;
- verifyCanNotSetLockTask(MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID, adminDifferentPackage, poPackages, poFlags);
-
- // Setting same affiliation ids
- final Set<String> userAffiliationIds = Collections.singleton("some-affiliation-id");
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
- dpm.setAffiliationIds(admin1, userAffiliationIds);
-
- mContext.binder.callingUid = MANAGED_PROFILE_ADMIN_UID;
- dpm.setAffiliationIds(adminDifferentPackage, userAffiliationIds);
-
- // Now the managed profile can set lock task packages.
- dpm.setLockTaskPackages(adminDifferentPackage, poPackages);
- MoreAsserts.assertEquals(poPackages, dpm.getLockTaskPackages(adminDifferentPackage));
- assertTrue(dpm.isLockTaskPermitted("poPackage1"));
- assertFalse(dpm.isLockTaskPermitted("doPackage2"));
- // And it can set lock task features.
- dpm.setLockTaskFeatures(adminDifferentPackage, poFlags);
- verifyLockTaskState(MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, poPackages, poFlags);
-
- // Unaffiliate the profile, lock task mode no longer available on the profile.
- dpm.setAffiliationIds(adminDifferentPackage, Collections.emptySet());
- assertFalse(dpm.isLockTaskPermitted("poPackage1"));
- // Lock task packages cleared when loading user data and when the user becomes unaffiliated.
- verify(getServices().iactivityManager, times(2)).updateLockTaskPackages(
- MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, new String[0]);
- verify(getServices().iactivityTaskManager, times(2)).updateLockTaskFeatures(
- MANAGED_PROFILE_USER_ID, DevicePolicyManager.LOCK_TASK_FEATURE_NONE);
-
- // Verify that lock task packages were not cleared for the DO
- mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_SYSTEM_USER_UID;
- assertTrue(dpm.isLockTaskPermitted("doPackage1"));
-
- }
-
public void testLockTaskPolicyForProfileOwner() throws Exception {
// Setup a PO
mContext.binder.callingUid = DpmMockContext.CALLER_UID;