diff options
| author | 2022-07-28 19:24:55 +0000 | |
|---|---|---|
| committer | 2022-07-28 19:27:32 +0000 | |
| commit | ebcd3fd4450f65c29ed154ae6fc45a97609bc4a3 (patch) | |
| tree | 6a8f72cb64f8e9afdcf5ebacd327084ce8cf215a | |
| parent | 7dab5f76949dbf7f3f94098d11b812de9d54972f (diff) | |
Simplify passwordToHistoryHash()
When processing the password and salt, just use update() instead of
concatenating them into an array. No change in behavior, as verified by
LockscreenCredentialTest.testPasswordToHistoryHash().
Test: atest LockscreenCredentialTest
Change-Id: I92e240dbe4df6c30fe35444b1452bb003421243b
| -rw-r--r-- | core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockscreenCredential.java | 7 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockscreenCredential.java b/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockscreenCredential.java index 40164a45516e..6bde5e690483 100644 --- a/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockscreenCredential.java +++ b/core/java/com/android/internal/widget/LockscreenCredential.java @@ -278,11 +278,8 @@ public class LockscreenCredential implements Parcelable, AutoCloseable { try { MessageDigest sha256 = MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-256"); sha256.update(hashFactor); - byte[] saltedPassword = Arrays.copyOf(passwordToHash, passwordToHash.length - + salt.length); - System.arraycopy(salt, 0, saltedPassword, passwordToHash.length, salt.length); - sha256.update(saltedPassword); - Arrays.fill(saltedPassword, (byte) 0); + sha256.update(passwordToHash); + sha256.update(salt); return new String(HexEncoding.encode(sha256.digest())); } catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) { throw new AssertionError("Missing digest algorithm: ", e); |