diff options
| author | 2016-11-22 15:18:32 +0000 | |
|---|---|---|
| committer | 2016-11-23 16:59:22 +0000 | |
| commit | bfc7faaf353ea75ab04e986edbc79478679d40f6 (patch) | |
| tree | c233c8fd1610985630b422c78b9bba97ba1ce0b0 | |
| parent | d427da8a2427a2ff7bb8f653f8b69647a5e1e940 (diff) | |
Fix boot loop when upgrading direclty from L to N
A second attempt to fix the upgrade problem due to SID == 0
in the above upgrade path. The previous fix contains a bug
where it would cause future attempts to unify work challenge
to silently fail, and crash SystemUi when unlocking.
This fix adds a check for non-zero SID before doing the initial work
profile unification (which caused the upgrade crash when SID == 0).
This means the initial work profile unification would only happen when
the user has unlocked the lockscreen and SID is generated.
Bug: 32490092
Bug: 33050562
Change-Id: Ib28951b2ec26b4f091df7763d9902f55616fcb5c
| -rw-r--r-- | services/core/java/com/android/server/LockSettingsService.java | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/LockSettingsService.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/LockSettingsService.java index a91e2053c01d..03744f838036 100644 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/LockSettingsService.java +++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/LockSettingsService.java @@ -240,6 +240,17 @@ public class LockSettingsService extends ILockSettings.Stub { if (DEBUG) Slog.v(TAG, "Parent does not have a screen lock"); return; } + // Do not tie when the parent has no SID (but does have a screen lock). + // This can only happen during an upgrade path where SID is yet to be + // generated when the user unlocks for the first time. + try { + if (getGateKeeperService().getSecureUserId(parentId) == 0) { + return; + } + } catch (RemoteException e) { + Slog.e(TAG, "Failed to talk to GateKeeper service", e); + return; + } if (DEBUG) Slog.v(TAG, "Tie managed profile to parent now!"); byte[] randomLockSeed = new byte[] {}; try { |