diff options
| author | 2023-04-04 23:08:11 -0700 | |
|---|---|---|
| committer | 2023-04-05 06:14:32 +0000 | |
| commit | 7374d5303cd561be1e9a20acaf4f91cdc53c49ab (patch) | |
| tree | 8fb83bfa1bab6cf7d2c67ba7b8d02cb1a7b03cda | |
| parent | 509461ed312a930d34b04390e5ea271ae0f03fed (diff) | |
Fix log message
The extra `NOT` of the double negation caused confusion debugging
b/270612197. The opposite of `blocked` is simply `allowed`, not `NOT
allowed`.
Test: atest BackgroundActivityStartController
Bug: 270612197
Change-Id: Ie91a628dffe433f84f5e8af0809246d1ab7fe16e
| -rw-r--r-- | services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/BackgroundActivityStartController.java | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/BackgroundActivityStartController.java b/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/BackgroundActivityStartController.java index 6773bcd6fac8..e447049a7362 100644 --- a/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/BackgroundActivityStartController.java +++ b/services/core/java/com/android/server/wm/BackgroundActivityStartController.java @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ public class BackgroundActivityStartController { // The verdict changed from allow (resultIfPiSenderAllowsBal) to block, PI sender // default change is on (otherwise we would have fallen into if above) and we'd // allow if it were off - Slog.wtf(TAG, "Without BAL hardening this activity start would NOT be allowed!" + Slog.wtf(TAG, "Without BAL hardening this activity start would be allowed!" + stateDumpLog); } } |