Correct link type for module stubs

Module stubs compile against module_current, so any module depending on
them had to compile against module_current (or broader) too. Treat them
as the API surface the stubs are for.

Bug: 157010342
Test: m
Change-Id: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
Merged-In: I49b9082dc1b5afe6c22e94126e574dd8061f0f39
(cherry picked from commit 0bd88d0b4e782df6aa99475307a4cfab6d617d14)

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/java/sdk_library.go b/java/sdk_library.go
index ee62390e7..de5ee03c4 100644
--- a/java/sdk_library.go
+++ b/java/sdk_library.go
@@ -1577,6 +1577,24 @@ func (s *frameworkModulesNamingScheme) apiModuleName(scope *apiScope, baseName s
 
 var _ sdkLibraryComponentNamingScheme = (*frameworkModulesNamingScheme)(nil)
 
+func moduleStubLinkType(name string) (stub bool, ret linkType) {
+	// This suffix-based approach is fragile and could potentially mis-trigger.
+	// TODO(b/155164730): Clean this up when modules no longer reference sdk_lib stubs directly.
+	if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.public") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-publicapi") {
+		return true, javaSdk
+	}
+	if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.system") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-systemapi") {
+		return true, javaSystem
+	}
+	if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.module_lib") || strings.HasSuffix(name, "-stubs-module_libs_api") {
+		return true, javaModule
+	}
+	if strings.HasSuffix(name, ".stubs.test") {
+		return true, javaSystem
+	}
+	return false, javaPlatform
+}
+
 // java_sdk_library is a special Java library that provides optional platform APIs to apps.
 // In practice, it can be viewed as a combination of several modules: 1) stubs library that clients
 // are linked against to, 2) droiddoc module that internally generates API stubs source files,