Incorporate bpf into mixed builds

Bug: 240163393
Test: TestBpfWithBazel in bpf_test.go
Change-Id: I1d24a9c0d1d6911987c730bf1b5b7e02d6e73a5e

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/bpf/bpf_test.go b/bpf/bpf_test.go
index 6e3909680..a2010ff2f 100644
--- a/bpf/bpf_test.go
+++ b/bpf/bpf_test.go
@@ -71,3 +71,26 @@ func TestBpfSourceName(t *testing.T) {
 		`\QAndroid.bp:2:3: module "bpf_invalid_name.o" variant "android_common": invalid character '_' in source name\E`)).
 		RunTestWithBp(t, bp)
 }
+
+func TestBpfWithBazel(t *testing.T) {
+	bp := `
+		bpf {
+			name: "bpf.o",
+			srcs: ["bpf.c"],
+			bazel_module: { label: "//bpf" },
+		}
+	`
+
+	result := android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+		prepareForBpfTest, android.FixtureModifyConfig(func(config android.Config) {
+			config.BazelContext = android.MockBazelContext{
+				OutputBaseDir: "outputbase",
+				LabelToOutputFiles: map[string][]string{
+					"//bpf": []string{"bpf.o"}}}
+		})).RunTestWithBp(t, bp)
+
+	output := result.Module("bpf.o", "android_common").(*bpf)
+
+	expectedOutputFiles := []string{"outputbase/execroot/__main__/bpf.o"}
+	android.AssertDeepEquals(t, "output files", expectedOutputFiles, output.objs.Strings())
+}