Exclude sdkMemberVersionedDepTag from visibility enforcement

The implicit dependency from an unversioned sdk member to the snapshot
versions should be excluded from visibility enforcement as it provides
no benefit and would require snapshot members to be visible to their
original source modules which would complicate visibility handling.

Also, corrects a spelling mistake in sdkMemberVersionedDepTag.

Bug: 142940300
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: Ib7ea6a3d3904d042dca0ea12f6b9196d40de970b

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/sdk/sdk.go b/sdk/sdk.go
index 44e5cbbe4..3b0752ff7 100644
--- a/sdk/sdk.go
+++ b/sdk/sdk.go
@@ -285,12 +285,15 @@ type dependencyTag struct {
 
 // For dependencies from an in-development version of an SDK member to frozen versions of the same member
 // e.g. libfoo -> libfoo.mysdk.11 and libfoo.mysdk.12
-type sdkMemberVesionedDepTag struct {
+type sdkMemberVersionedDepTag struct {
 	dependencyTag
 	member  string
 	version string
 }
 
+// Mark this tag so dependencies that use it are excluded from visibility enforcement.
+func (t sdkMemberVersionedDepTag) ExcludeFromVisibilityEnforcement() {}
+
 // Step 1: create dependencies from an SDK module to its members.
 func memberMutator(mctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
 	if s, ok := mctx.Module().(*sdk); ok {
@@ -337,7 +340,7 @@ func memberInterVersionMutator(mctx android.BottomUpMutatorContext) {
 	if m, ok := mctx.Module().(android.SdkAware); ok && m.IsInAnySdk() {
 		if !m.ContainingSdk().Unversioned() {
 			memberName := m.MemberName()
-			tag := sdkMemberVesionedDepTag{member: memberName, version: m.ContainingSdk().Version}
+			tag := sdkMemberVersionedDepTag{member: memberName, version: m.ContainingSdk().Version}
 			mctx.AddReverseDependency(mctx.Module(), tag, memberName)
 		}
 	}