From 9865bde5d822f56c4732214c2005dfcaa41f94cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Chartier <mathieuc@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:58:16 -0800
Subject: Rename NullHandle to ScopedNullHandle

This makes it clearer that is invalid to do things like:
Handle<T> h = ScopedNullHandle<T>();

Bug: 26233305
Change-Id: I6d8f54eae01ec2e901cb7043afa853ea77db79fe
---
 runtime/native/java_lang_Class.cc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'runtime/native/java_lang_Class.cc')

diff --git a/runtime/native/java_lang_Class.cc b/runtime/native/java_lang_Class.cc
index 14d284e003..19774811bc 100644
--- a/runtime/native/java_lang_Class.cc
+++ b/runtime/native/java_lang_Class.cc
@@ -653,7 +653,8 @@ static jobject Class_newInstance(JNIEnv* env, jobject javaThis) {
     }
   }
   auto* constructor = klass->GetDeclaredConstructor(
-      soa.Self(), NullHandle<mirror::ObjectArray<mirror::Class>>());
+      soa.Self(),
+      ScopedNullHandle<mirror::ObjectArray<mirror::Class>>());
   if (UNLIKELY(constructor == nullptr)) {
     soa.Self()->ThrowNewExceptionF("Ljava/lang/InstantiationException;",
                                    "%s has no zero argument constructor",
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b