From 384c7861b27f6b5ded42a32ab7d14a48c987f515 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:45:19 -0800
Subject: Handle black allocations in concurrent mark-compact

Test: art/test/testrunner/testrunner.py
Bug: 160737021
Change-Id: I4ad6d090cbf87a9120bbc4aaf778a2e1b0d8ae6b
---
 runtime/jit/jit_code_cache.cc | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'runtime/jit/jit_code_cache.cc')

diff --git a/runtime/jit/jit_code_cache.cc b/runtime/jit/jit_code_cache.cc
index 3eb1701080..6c83741df0 100644
--- a/runtime/jit/jit_code_cache.cc
+++ b/runtime/jit/jit_code_cache.cc
@@ -422,7 +422,6 @@ void JitCodeCache::SweepRootTables(IsMarkedVisitor* visitor) {
         // TODO: Do not use IsMarked for j.l.Class, and adjust once we move this method
         // out of the weak access/creation pause. b/32167580
         if (new_object != nullptr && new_object != object) {
-          DCHECK(new_object->IsString());
           roots[i] = GcRoot<mirror::Object>(new_object);
         }
       } else {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b