diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | test/Android.run-test.mk | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test/knownfailures.json | 24 |
2 files changed, 1 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/test/Android.run-test.mk b/test/Android.run-test.mk index dbf516a301..b937c931e7 100644 --- a/test/Android.run-test.mk +++ b/test/Android.run-test.mk @@ -533,26 +533,14 @@ TEST_ART_BROKEN_INTERPRETER_RUN_TESTS := # also uses Generic JNI instead of the JNI compiler. # Test 906 iterates the heap filtering with different options. No instances should be created # between those runs to be able to have precise checks. -# Test 902 hits races with the JIT compiler. b/32821077 # Test 629 requires compilation. -# Test 914, 915, 917, & 919 are very sensitive to the exact state of the stack, -# including the jit-inserted runtime frames. This causes them to be somewhat -# flaky as JIT tests. This should be fixed once b/33630159 or b/33616143 are -# resolved but until then just disable them. Test 916 already checks this -# feature for JIT use cases in a way that is resilient to the jit frames. # 912: b/34655682 TEST_ART_BROKEN_JIT_RUN_TESTS := \ 137-cfi \ 629-vdex-speed \ - 902-hello-transformation \ 904-object-allocation \ 906-iterate-heap \ 912-classes \ - 914-hello-obsolescence \ - 915-obsolete-2 \ - 917-fields-transformation \ - 919-obsolete-fields \ - 926-multi-obsolescence \ ifneq (,$(filter jit,$(COMPILER_TYPES))) ART_TEST_KNOWN_BROKEN += $(call all-run-test-names,$(TARGET_TYPES),$(RUN_TYPES),$(PREBUILD_TYPES), \ diff --git a/test/knownfailures.json b/test/knownfailures.json index 98d56d4d9a..84df9241db 100644 --- a/test/knownfailures.json +++ b/test/knownfailures.json @@ -241,12 +241,6 @@ "variant": "interpreter | jit" }, { - "test": "902-hello-transformation", - "description": "Test 902 hits races with the JIT compiler.", - "bug": "http://b/32821077", - "variant": "jit" - }, - { "test": "906-iterate-heap", "description": ["Test 906 iterates the heap filtering with different", "options. No instances should be created between those", @@ -254,23 +248,7 @@ "variant": "jit" }, { - "tests": ["914-hello-obsolescence", - "915-obsolete-2", - "917-fields-transformation", - "919-obsolete-fields"], - "description": ["Test 914, 915, 917, & 919 are very sensitive to the", - "exact state of the stack, including the jit-inserted", - "runtime frames. This causes them to be somewhat flaky", - "as JIT tests. This should be fixed once b/33630159 or", - "b/33616143 are resolved but until then just disable", - "them. Test 916 already checks this feature for JIT", - "use cases in a way that is resilient to the jit", - "frames."], - "variant": "jit" - }, - { - "tests": ["926-multi-obsolescence", - "904-object-allocation"], + "tests": ["904-object-allocation"], "variant": "jit" }, { |