ART: Compacting ROS/DlMalloc spaces with semispace copy GC
Current semispace copy GC is mainly associated with bump pointer
spaces. Though it squeezes fragmentation most aggressively, an extra
copy is required to re-establish the data in the ROS/DlMalloc space to allow
CMS GCs to happen afterwards. As semispace copy GC is still stop-the-world,
this not only introduces unnecessary overheads but also longer response time.
Response time indicates the time duration between the start of transition
request and the start of transition animation, which may impact the user
experience.
Using semispace copy GC to compact the data in a ROS space to another ROS(or
DlMalloc space to another DlMalloc) space solves this problem. Although it
squeezes less fragmentation, CMS GCs can run immediately after the compaction.
We apply this algorithm in two cases:
1) Right before throwing an OOM if -XX:EnableHSpaceCompactForOOM is passed in
as true.
2) When app is switched to background if the -XX:BackgroundGC option has value
HSpaceCompact.
For case 1), OOMs are significantly delayed in the harmony GC stress test,
with compaction ratio up to 0.87. For case 2), compaction ratio around 0.5 is
observed in both built-in SMS and browser. Similar results have been obtained
on other apps as well.
Change-Id: Iad9eabc6d046659fda3535ae20f21bc31f89ded3
Signed-off-by: Wang, Zuo <zuo.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chang, Yang <yang.chang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lei Li <lei.l.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Zang <lin.zang@intel.com>
diff --git a/test/082-inline-execute/src/Main.java b/test/082-inline-execute/src/Main.java
index f412034..739dbf8 100644
--- a/test/082-inline-execute/src/Main.java
+++ b/test/082-inline-execute/src/Main.java
@@ -61,9 +61,6 @@
test_Memory_pokeShort();
test_Memory_pokeInt();
test_Memory_pokeLong();
- test_AtomicBoolean_compareAndSet();
- test_AtomicInteger_compareAndSet();
- test_AtomicLong_compareAndSet();
}
/*
@@ -96,60 +93,6 @@
Assert.assertNotNull(Thread.currentThread());
}
- /**
- * Will test inlining CAS, by inclusion of AtomicBoolean in core.oat.
- */
- public static void test_AtomicBoolean_compareAndSet() {
- java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean ab = new java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean();
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(false, false), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(true, false), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(true, true), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(false, true), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(false, true), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(false, false), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(true, true), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(true, false), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(true, false), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(true, true), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(false, false), true);
- }
-
- /**
- * Will test inlining CAS, by inclusion of AtomicInteger in core.oat.
- */
- public static void test_AtomicInteger_compareAndSet() {
- java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger ab = new java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger();
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0, 0), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x12345678, 0), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x12345678, 0x12345678), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0, 0x12345678), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0, 0x12345678), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0, 0), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x12345678, 0x12345678), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x12345678, 0), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x12345678, 0), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x12345678, 0x12345678), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0, 0), true);
- }
-
- /**
- * Will test inlining CAS, by inclusion of AtomicLong in core.oat.
- */
- public static void test_AtomicLong_compareAndSet() {
- java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong ab = new java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong();
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0l, 0l), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x1234567890l, 0l), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x1234567890l, 0x1234567890l), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0l, 0x1234567890l), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0l, 0x1234567890l), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0l, 0l), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x1234567890l, 0x1234567890l), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x1234567890l, 0l), true);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x1234567890l, 0l), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0x1234567890l, 0x1234567890l), false);
- Assert.assertEquals(ab.compareAndSet(0l, 0l), true);
- }
-
public static void test_String_length() {
String str0 = "";
String str1 = "x";
@@ -580,6 +523,7 @@
static Object runtime;
static Method address_of;
+ static Method new_non_movable_array;
static Method peek_byte;
static Method peek_short;
static Method peek_int;
@@ -594,6 +538,7 @@
Method get_runtime = vm_runtime.getDeclaredMethod("getRuntime");
runtime = get_runtime.invoke(null);
address_of = vm_runtime.getDeclaredMethod("addressOf", Object.class);
+ new_non_movable_array = vm_runtime.getDeclaredMethod("newNonMovableArray", Class.class, Integer.TYPE);
Class<?> io_memory = Class.forName("libcore.io.Memory");
peek_byte = io_memory.getDeclaredMethod("peekByte", Long.TYPE);
@@ -607,7 +552,7 @@
}
public static void test_Memory_peekByte() throws Exception {
- byte[] b = new byte [2];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 2);
b[0] = 0x12;
b[1] = 0x11;
long address = (long)address_of.invoke(runtime, b);
@@ -616,7 +561,7 @@
}
public static void test_Memory_peekShort() throws Exception {
- byte[] b = new byte [3];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 3);
b[0] = 0x13;
b[1] = 0x12;
b[2] = 0x11;
@@ -626,7 +571,7 @@
}
public static void test_Memory_peekInt() throws Exception {
- byte[] b = new byte [5];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 5);
b[0] = 0x15;
b[1] = 0x14;
b[2] = 0x13;
@@ -638,7 +583,7 @@
}
public static void test_Memory_peekLong() throws Exception {
- byte[] b = new byte [9];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 9);
b[0] = 0x19;
b[1] = 0x18;
b[2] = 0x17;
@@ -655,7 +600,7 @@
public static void test_Memory_pokeByte() throws Exception {
byte[] r = {0x11, 0x12};
- byte[] b = new byte [2];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 2);
long address = (long)address_of.invoke(runtime, b);
poke_byte.invoke(null, address, (byte)0x11);
poke_byte.invoke(null, address + 1, (byte)0x12);
@@ -665,7 +610,7 @@
public static void test_Memory_pokeShort() throws Exception {
byte[] ra = {0x12, 0x11, 0x13};
byte[] ru = {0x12, 0x22, 0x21};
- byte[] b = new byte [3];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 3);
long address = (long)address_of.invoke(runtime, b);
// Aligned write
@@ -681,7 +626,7 @@
public static void test_Memory_pokeInt() throws Exception {
byte[] ra = {0x14, 0x13, 0x12, 0x11, 0x15};
byte[] ru = {0x14, 0x24, 0x23, 0x22, 0x21};
- byte[] b = new byte [5];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 5);
long address = (long)address_of.invoke(runtime, b);
b[4] = 0x15;
@@ -695,7 +640,7 @@
public static void test_Memory_pokeLong() throws Exception {
byte[] ra = {0x18, 0x17, 0x16, 0x15, 0x14, 0x13, 0x12, 0x11, 0x19};
byte[] ru = {0x18, 0x28, 0x27, 0x26, 0x25, 0x24, 0x23, 0x22, 0x21};
- byte[] b = new byte [9];
+ byte[] b = (byte[])new_non_movable_array.invoke(runtime, Byte.TYPE, 9);
long address = (long)address_of.invoke(runtime, b);
b[8] = 0x19;