[PATCH] mm: dup_mmap use oldmm more
Use the parent's oldmm throughout dup_mmap, instead of perversely going back
to current->mm. (Can you hear the sigh of relief from those mpnts? Usually I
squash them, but not today.)
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 2048ed7..0e7fe4a 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -182,16 +182,16 @@
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
-static inline int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct * mm, struct mm_struct * oldmm)
+static inline int dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_struct *oldmm)
{
- struct vm_area_struct * mpnt, *tmp, **pprev;
+ struct vm_area_struct *mpnt, *tmp, **pprev;
struct rb_node **rb_link, *rb_parent;
int retval;
unsigned long charge;
struct mempolicy *pol;
down_write(&oldmm->mmap_sem);
- flush_cache_mm(current->mm);
+ flush_cache_mm(oldmm);
mm->locked_vm = 0;
mm->mmap = NULL;
mm->mmap_cache = NULL;
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
rb_parent = NULL;
pprev = &mm->mmap;
- for (mpnt = current->mm->mmap ; mpnt ; mpnt = mpnt->vm_next) {
+ for (mpnt = oldmm->mmap; mpnt; mpnt = mpnt->vm_next) {
struct file *file;
if (mpnt->vm_flags & VM_DONTCOPY) {
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
rb_parent = &tmp->vm_rb;
mm->map_count++;
- retval = copy_page_range(mm, current->mm, tmp);
+ retval = copy_page_range(mm, oldmm, tmp);
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
if (tmp->vm_ops && tmp->vm_ops->open)
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
retval = 0;
out:
- flush_tlb_mm(current->mm);
+ flush_tlb_mm(oldmm);
up_write(&oldmm->mmap_sem);
return retval;
fail_nomem_policy: