Btrfs: check_int: use the known block location
The xfstest btrfs/014 which tests the balance operation caused issues with
the check_int module. The attempt was made to use btrfs_map_block() to
find the physical location for a written block. However, this was not
at all needed since the location of the written block was known since
a hook to submit_bio() was the reason for entering the check_int module.
Additionally, after a block relocation it happened that btrfs_map_block()
failed causing misleading error messages afterwards.
This patch changes the check_int module to use the known information of
the physical location from the bio.
Reported-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Tested-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index 66e820f..b5aa812 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
@@ -326,9 +326,6 @@
static int btrfsic_map_block(struct btrfsic_state *state, u64 bytenr, u32 len,
struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *block_ctx_out,
int mirror_num);
-static int btrfsic_map_superblock(struct btrfsic_state *state, u64 bytenr,
- u32 len, struct block_device *bdev,
- struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *block_ctx_out);
static void btrfsic_release_block_ctx(struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *block_ctx);
static int btrfsic_read_block(struct btrfsic_state *state,
struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *block_ctx);
@@ -1607,25 +1604,6 @@
return ret;
}
-static int btrfsic_map_superblock(struct btrfsic_state *state, u64 bytenr,
- u32 len, struct block_device *bdev,
- struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *block_ctx_out)
-{
- block_ctx_out->dev = btrfsic_dev_state_lookup(bdev);
- block_ctx_out->dev_bytenr = bytenr;
- block_ctx_out->start = bytenr;
- block_ctx_out->len = len;
- block_ctx_out->datav = NULL;
- block_ctx_out->pagev = NULL;
- block_ctx_out->mem_to_free = NULL;
- if (NULL != block_ctx_out->dev) {
- return 0;
- } else {
- printk(KERN_INFO "btrfsic: error, cannot lookup dev (#2)!\n");
- return -ENXIO;
- }
-}
-
static void btrfsic_release_block_ctx(struct btrfsic_block_data_ctx *block_ctx)
{
if (block_ctx->mem_to_free) {
@@ -2002,24 +1980,13 @@
}
}
- if (block->is_superblock)
- ret = btrfsic_map_superblock(state, bytenr,
- processed_len,
- bdev, &block_ctx);
- else
- ret = btrfsic_map_block(state, bytenr, processed_len,
- &block_ctx, 0);
- if (ret) {
- printk(KERN_INFO
- "btrfsic: btrfsic_map_block(root @%llu)"
- " failed!\n", bytenr);
- goto continue_loop;
- }
- block_ctx.datav = mapped_datav;
- /* the following is required in case of writes to mirrors,
- * use the same that was used for the lookup */
block_ctx.dev = dev_state;
block_ctx.dev_bytenr = dev_bytenr;
+ block_ctx.start = bytenr;
+ block_ctx.len = processed_len;
+ block_ctx.pagev = NULL;
+ block_ctx.mem_to_free = NULL;
+ block_ctx.datav = mapped_datav;
if (is_metadata || state->include_extent_data) {
block->never_written = 0;
@@ -2133,10 +2100,6 @@
/* this is getting ugly for the
* include_extent_data case... */
bytenr = 0; /* unknown */
- block_ctx.start = bytenr;
- block_ctx.len = processed_len;
- block_ctx.mem_to_free = NULL;
- block_ctx.pagev = NULL;
} else {
processed_len = state->metablock_size;
bytenr = btrfs_stack_header_bytenr(
@@ -2149,22 +2112,15 @@
"Written block @%llu (%s/%llu/?)"
" !found in hash table, M.\n",
bytenr, dev_state->name, dev_bytenr);
-
- ret = btrfsic_map_block(state, bytenr, processed_len,
- &block_ctx, 0);
- if (ret) {
- printk(KERN_INFO
- "btrfsic: btrfsic_map_block(root @%llu)"
- " failed!\n",
- dev_bytenr);
- goto continue_loop;
- }
}
- block_ctx.datav = mapped_datav;
- /* the following is required in case of writes to mirrors,
- * use the same that was used for the lookup */
+
block_ctx.dev = dev_state;
block_ctx.dev_bytenr = dev_bytenr;
+ block_ctx.start = bytenr;
+ block_ctx.len = processed_len;
+ block_ctx.pagev = NULL;
+ block_ctx.mem_to_free = NULL;
+ block_ctx.datav = mapped_datav;
block = btrfsic_block_alloc();
if (NULL == block) {