[POWERPC] spufs: use kzalloc in create_spu
Clean up create_spu() a little by using kzalloc instead of kmalloc +
assignments.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
index fd6ea57..eb367dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@
static int number;
ret = -ENOMEM;
- spu = kmalloc(sizeof (*spu), GFP_KERNEL);
+ spu = kzalloc(sizeof (*spu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!spu)
goto out;
@@ -713,28 +713,11 @@
spu->nid = of_node_to_nid(spe);
if (spu->nid == -1)
spu->nid = 0;
-
- spu->stop_code = 0;
- spu->slb_replace = 0;
- spu->mm = NULL;
- spu->ctx = NULL;
- spu->rq = NULL;
- spu->pid = 0;
- spu->class_0_pending = 0;
- spu->flags = 0UL;
- spu->dar = 0UL;
- spu->dsisr = 0UL;
spin_lock_init(&spu->register_lock);
-
spu_mfc_sdr_set(spu, mfspr(SPRN_SDR1));
spu_mfc_sr1_set(spu, 0x33);
-
- spu->ibox_callback = NULL;
- spu->wbox_callback = NULL;
- spu->stop_callback = NULL;
- spu->mfc_callback = NULL;
-
mutex_lock(&spu_mutex);
+
spu->number = number++;
ret = spu_request_irqs(spu);
if (ret)