lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens
NLM locks don't conflict with NFSv4 share reservations, so we're not
going to learn anything new by watiting for them.
They do conflict with NFSv4 locks and with delegations.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index e779d7d..b9681ee 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -415,10 +415,10 @@
/* Openowner is now set, so sequence id will get bumped. Now we need
* these checks before we do any creates: */
status = nfserr_grace;
- if (locks_in_grace(net) && open->op_claim_type != NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS)
+ if (opens_in_grace(net) && open->op_claim_type != NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS)
goto out;
status = nfserr_no_grace;
- if (!locks_in_grace(net) && open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS)
+ if (!opens_in_grace(net) && open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS)
goto out;
switch (open->op_claim_type) {
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@
{
__be32 status;
- if (locks_in_grace(SVC_NET(rqstp)))
+ if (opens_in_grace(SVC_NET(rqstp)))
return nfserr_grace;
status = nfsd_unlink(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, 0,
remove->rm_name, remove->rm_namelen);
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@
if (!cstate->save_fh.fh_dentry)
return status;
- if (locks_in_grace(SVC_NET(rqstp)) &&
+ if (opens_in_grace(SVC_NET(rqstp)) &&
!(cstate->save_fh.fh_export->ex_flags & NFSEXP_NOSUBTREECHECK))
return nfserr_grace;
status = nfsd_rename(rqstp, &cstate->save_fh, rename->rn_sname,