mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" loop
Purely cosmetic, but the complex "if" condition looks annoying to me.
Especially because it is not consistent with OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN check
which adds another if/continue.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Kyle Walker <kwalker@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislav Kozina <skozina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index c837d06..2b6e880 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -574,14 +574,18 @@
* pending fatal signal.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p)
- if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) &&
- !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
- if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
- continue;
+ for_each_process(p) {
+ if (p->mm != mm)
+ continue;
+ if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
+ continue;
+ if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ continue;
+ if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
+ continue;
- do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
- }
+ do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
mmdrop(mm);