clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c
index 77a365f..c69e277 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-dbx500-prcmu.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
static void __iomem *clksrc_dbx500_timer_base;
-static cycle_t notrace clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 notrace clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_read(struct clocksource *cs)
{
void __iomem *base = clksrc_dbx500_timer_base;
u32 count, count2;