diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 05c1261..87ac364 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -95,25 +95,6 @@
 unsigned long nr_list_entries;
 static struct lock_list list_entries[MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES];
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-/*
- * Allocate a lockdep entry. (assumes the graph_lock held, returns
- * with NULL on failure)
- */
-static struct lock_list *alloc_list_entry(void)
-{
-	if (nr_list_entries >= MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES) {
-		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-			return NULL;
-
-		printk("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low!\n");
-		printk("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
-		return NULL;
-	}
-	return list_entries + nr_list_entries++;
-}
-#endif
-
 /*
  * All data structures here are protected by the global debug_lock.
  *
@@ -141,11 +122,6 @@
 
 static struct list_head classhash_table[CLASSHASH_SIZE];
 
-unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-static struct lock_chain lock_chains[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS];
-#endif
-
 /*
  * We put the lock dependency chains into a hash-table as well, to cache
  * their existence:
@@ -227,26 +203,6 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-
-static int hardirq_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
-{
-#if HARDIRQ_VERBOSE
-	return class_filter(class);
-#endif
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int softirq_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
-{
-#if SOFTIRQ_VERBOSE
-	return class_filter(class);
-#endif
-	return 0;
-}
-
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
  * addresses. Protected by the graph_lock.
@@ -486,68 +442,6 @@
 	}
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-/*
- * Add a new dependency to the head of the list:
- */
-static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *class, struct lock_class *this,
-			    struct list_head *head, unsigned long ip, int distance)
-{
-	struct lock_list *entry;
-	/*
-	 * Lock not present yet - get a new dependency struct and
-	 * add it to the list:
-	 */
-	entry = alloc_list_entry();
-	if (!entry)
-		return 0;
-
-	entry->class = this;
-	entry->distance = distance;
-	if (!save_trace(&entry->trace))
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Since we never remove from the dependency list, the list can
-	 * be walked lockless by other CPUs, it's only allocation
-	 * that must be protected by the spinlock. But this also means
-	 * we must make new entries visible only once writes to the
-	 * entry become visible - hence the RCU op:
-	 */
-	list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->entry, head);
-
-	return 1;
-}
-
-/*
- * Recursive, forwards-direction lock-dependency checking, used for
- * both noncyclic checking and for hardirq-unsafe/softirq-unsafe
- * checking.
- *
- * (to keep the stackframe of the recursive functions small we
- *  use these global variables, and we also mark various helper
- *  functions as noinline.)
- */
-static struct held_lock *check_source, *check_target;
-
-/*
- * Print a dependency chain entry (this is only done when a deadlock
- * has been detected):
- */
-static noinline int
-print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_list *target, unsigned int depth)
-{
-	if (debug_locks_silent)
-		return 0;
-	printk("\n-> #%u", depth);
-	print_lock_name(target->class);
-	printk(":\n");
-	print_stack_trace(&target->trace, 6);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
 static void print_kernel_version(void)
 {
 	printk("%s %.*s\n", init_utsname()->release,
@@ -555,99 +449,6 @@
 		init_utsname()->version);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-/*
- * When a circular dependency is detected, print the
- * header first:
- */
-static noinline int
-print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth)
-{
-	struct task_struct *curr = current;
-
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
-		return 0;
-
-	printk("\n=======================================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]\n");
-	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "-------------------------------------------------------\n");
-	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
-		curr->comm, curr->pid);
-	print_lock(check_source);
-	printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n");
-	print_lock(check_target);
-	printk("\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n");
-	printk("\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n");
-
-	print_circular_bug_entry(entry, depth);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static noinline int print_circular_bug_tail(void)
-{
-	struct task_struct *curr = current;
-	struct lock_list this;
-
-	if (debug_locks_silent)
-		return 0;
-
-	this.class = check_source->class;
-	if (!save_trace(&this.trace))
-		return 0;
-
-	print_circular_bug_entry(&this, 0);
-
-	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
-	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
-
-	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
-	dump_stack();
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-#define RECURSION_LIMIT 40
-
-static int noinline print_infinite_recursion_bug(void)
-{
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-		return 0;
-
-	WARN_ON(1);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Prove that the dependency graph starting at <entry> can not
- * lead to <target>. Print an error and return 0 if it does.
- */
-static noinline int
-check_noncircular(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
-{
-	struct lock_list *entry;
-
-	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_cyclic_check_recursions);
-	if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
-		max_recursion_depth = depth;
-	if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
-		return print_infinite_recursion_bug();
-	/*
-	 * Check this lock's dependency list:
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_after, entry) {
-		if (entry->class == check_target->class)
-			return print_circular_bug_header(entry, depth+1);
-		debug_atomic_inc(&nr_cyclic_checks);
-		if (!check_noncircular(entry->class, depth+1))
-			return print_circular_bug_entry(entry, depth+1);
-	}
-	return 1;
-}
-#endif
-
 static int very_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 {
 #if VERY_VERBOSE
@@ -655,448 +456,6 @@
 #endif
 	return 0;
 }
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-
-/*
- * Forwards and backwards subgraph searching, for the purposes of
- * proving that two subgraphs can be connected by a new dependency
- * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency.
- */
-static enum lock_usage_bit find_usage_bit;
-static struct lock_class *forwards_match, *backwards_match;
-
-/*
- * Find a node in the forwards-direction dependency sub-graph starting
- * at <source> that matches <find_usage_bit>.
- *
- * Return 2 if such a node exists in the subgraph, and put that node
- * into <forwards_match>.
- *
- * Return 1 otherwise and keep <forwards_match> unchanged.
- * Return 0 on error.
- */
-static noinline int
-find_usage_forwards(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
-{
-	struct lock_list *entry;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
-		max_recursion_depth = depth;
-	if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
-		return print_infinite_recursion_bug();
-
-	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks);
-	if (source->usage_mask & (1 << find_usage_bit)) {
-		forwards_match = source;
-		return 2;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Check this lock's dependency list:
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_after, entry) {
-		debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions);
-		ret = find_usage_forwards(entry->class, depth+1);
-		if (ret == 2 || ret == 0)
-			return ret;
-	}
-	return 1;
-}
-
-/*
- * Find a node in the backwards-direction dependency sub-graph starting
- * at <source> that matches <find_usage_bit>.
- *
- * Return 2 if such a node exists in the subgraph, and put that node
- * into <backwards_match>.
- *
- * Return 1 otherwise and keep <backwards_match> unchanged.
- * Return 0 on error.
- */
-static noinline int
-find_usage_backwards(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
-{
-	struct lock_list *entry;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (!__raw_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock))
-		return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
-
-	if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
-		max_recursion_depth = depth;
-	if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
-		return print_infinite_recursion_bug();
-
-	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks);
-	if (source->usage_mask & (1 << find_usage_bit)) {
-		backwards_match = source;
-		return 2;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Check this lock's dependency list:
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_before, entry) {
-		debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions);
-		ret = find_usage_backwards(entry->class, depth+1);
-		if (ret == 2 || ret == 0)
-			return ret;
-	}
-	return 1;
-}
-
-static int
-print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
-			 struct held_lock *prev,
-			 struct held_lock *next,
-			 enum lock_usage_bit bit1,
-			 enum lock_usage_bit bit2,
-			 const char *irqclass)
-{
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
-		return 0;
-
-	printk("\n======================================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: %s-safe -> %s-unsafe lock order detected ]\n",
-		irqclass, irqclass);
-	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "------------------------------------------------------\n");
-	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] is trying to acquire:\n",
-		curr->comm, curr->pid,
-		curr->hardirq_context, hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
-		curr->softirq_context, softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
-		curr->hardirqs_enabled,
-		curr->softirqs_enabled);
-	print_lock(next);
-
-	printk("\nand this task is already holding:\n");
-	print_lock(prev);
-	printk("which would create a new lock dependency:\n");
-	print_lock_name(prev->class);
-	printk(" ->");
-	print_lock_name(next->class);
-	printk("\n");
-
-	printk("\nbut this new dependency connects a %s-irq-safe lock:\n",
-		irqclass);
-	print_lock_name(backwards_match);
-	printk("\n... which became %s-irq-safe at:\n", irqclass);
-
-	print_stack_trace(backwards_match->usage_traces + bit1, 1);
-
-	printk("\nto a %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
-	print_lock_name(forwards_match);
-	printk("\n... which became %s-irq-unsafe at:\n", irqclass);
-	printk("...");
-
-	print_stack_trace(forwards_match->usage_traces + bit2, 1);
-
-	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
-	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
-
-	printk("\nthe %s-irq-safe lock's dependencies:\n", irqclass);
-	print_lock_dependencies(backwards_match, 0);
-
-	printk("\nthe %s-irq-unsafe lock's dependencies:\n", irqclass);
-	print_lock_dependencies(forwards_match, 0);
-
-	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
-	dump_stack();
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-	    struct held_lock *next, enum lock_usage_bit bit_backwards,
-	    enum lock_usage_bit bit_forwards, const char *irqclass)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	find_usage_bit = bit_backwards;
-	/* fills in <backwards_match> */
-	ret = find_usage_backwards(prev->class, 0);
-	if (!ret || ret == 1)
-		return ret;
-
-	find_usage_bit = bit_forwards;
-	ret = find_usage_forwards(next->class, 0);
-	if (!ret || ret == 1)
-		return ret;
-	/* ret == 2 */
-	return print_bad_irq_dependency(curr, prev, next,
-			bit_backwards, bit_forwards, irqclass);
-}
-
-#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
-static int
-print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-		   struct held_lock *next)
-{
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
-		return 0;
-
-	printk("\n=============================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]\n");
-	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "---------------------------------------------\n");
-	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
-		curr->comm, curr->pid);
-	print_lock(next);
-	printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n");
-	print_lock(prev);
-
-	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
-	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
-
-	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
-	dump_stack();
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Check whether we are holding such a class already.
- *
- * (Note that this has to be done separately, because the graph cannot
- * detect such classes of deadlocks.)
- *
- * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
- */
-static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
-	       struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
-{
-	struct held_lock *prev;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
-		prev = curr->held_locks + i;
-		if (prev->class != next->class)
-			continue;
-		/*
-		 * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
-		 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
-		 */
-		if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
-			return 2;
-		return print_deadlock_bug(curr, prev, next);
-	}
-	return 1;
-}
-
-/*
- * There was a chain-cache miss, and we are about to add a new dependency
- * to a previous lock. We recursively validate the following rules:
- *
- *  - would the adding of the <prev> -> <next> dependency create a
- *    circular dependency in the graph? [== circular deadlock]
- *
- *  - does the new prev->next dependency connect any hardirq-safe lock
- *    (in the full backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>) with any
- *    hardirq-unsafe lock (in the full forwards-subgraph starting at
- *    <next>)? [== illegal lock inversion with hardirq contexts]
- *
- *  - does the new prev->next dependency connect any softirq-safe lock
- *    (in the full backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>) with any
- *    softirq-unsafe lock (in the full forwards-subgraph starting at
- *    <next>)? [== illegal lock inversion with softirq contexts]
- *
- * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock.
- *
- * Then if all the validations pass, we add the forwards and backwards
- * dependency.
- */
-static int
-check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
-	       struct held_lock *next, int distance)
-{
-	struct lock_list *entry;
-	int ret;
-
-	/*
-	 * Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not
-	 * create a circular dependency in the graph. (We do this by
-	 * forward-recursing into the graph starting at <next>, and
-	 * checking whether we can reach <prev>.)
-	 *
-	 * We are using global variables to control the recursion, to
-	 * keep the stackframe size of the recursive functions low:
-	 */
-	check_source = next;
-	check_target = prev;
-	if (!(check_noncircular(next->class, 0)))
-		return print_circular_bug_tail();
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-	/*
-	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe
-	 * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
-	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
-	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
-	 */
-	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ,
-					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS, "hard"))
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe-read
-	 * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
-	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
-	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
-	 */
-	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ,
-					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS, "hard-read"))
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a softirq-safe
-	 * lock with a softirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
-	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
-	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
-	 */
-	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ,
-					LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS, "soft"))
-		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a softirq-safe-read
-	 * lock with a softirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
-	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
-	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
-	 */
-	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ,
-					LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS, "soft"))
-		return 0;
-#endif
-	/*
-	 * For recursive read-locks we do all the dependency checks,
-	 * but we dont store read-triggered dependencies (only
-	 * write-triggered dependencies). This ensures that only the
-	 * write-side dependencies matter, and that if for example a
-	 * write-lock never takes any other locks, then the reads are
-	 * equivalent to a NOP.
-	 */
-	if (next->read == 2 || prev->read == 2)
-		return 1;
-	/*
-	 * Is the <prev> -> <next> dependency already present?
-	 *
-	 * (this may occur even though this is a new chain: consider
-	 *  e.g. the L1 -> L2 -> L3 -> L4 and the L5 -> L1 -> L2 -> L3
-	 *  chains - the second one will be new, but L1 already has
-	 *  L2 added to its dependency list, due to the first chain.)
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(entry, &prev->class->locks_after, entry) {
-		if (entry->class == next->class) {
-			if (distance == 1)
-				entry->distance = 1;
-			return 2;
-		}
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Ok, all validations passed, add the new lock
-	 * to the previous lock's dependency list:
-	 */
-	ret = add_lock_to_list(prev->class, next->class,
-			       &prev->class->locks_after, next->acquire_ip, distance);
-
-	if (!ret)
-		return 0;
-
-	ret = add_lock_to_list(next->class, prev->class,
-			       &next->class->locks_before, next->acquire_ip, distance);
-	if (!ret)
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Debugging printouts:
-	 */
-	if (verbose(prev->class) || verbose(next->class)) {
-		graph_unlock();
-		printk("\n new dependency: ");
-		print_lock_name(prev->class);
-		printk(" => ");
-		print_lock_name(next->class);
-		printk("\n");
-		dump_stack();
-		return graph_lock();
-	}
-	return 1;
-}
-
-/*
- * Add the dependency to all directly-previous locks that are 'relevant'.
- * The ones that are relevant are (in increasing distance from curr):
- * all consecutive trylock entries and the final non-trylock entry - or
- * the end of this context's lock-chain - whichever comes first.
- */
-static int
-check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
-{
-	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
-	struct held_lock *hlock;
-
-	/*
-	 * Debugging checks.
-	 *
-	 * Depth must not be zero for a non-head lock:
-	 */
-	if (!depth)
-		goto out_bug;
-	/*
-	 * At least two relevant locks must exist for this
-	 * to be a head:
-	 */
-	if (curr->held_locks[depth].irq_context !=
-			curr->held_locks[depth-1].irq_context)
-		goto out_bug;
-
-	for (;;) {
-		int distance = curr->lockdep_depth - depth + 1;
-		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth-1;
-		/*
-		 * Only non-recursive-read entries get new dependencies
-		 * added:
-		 */
-		if (hlock->read != 2) {
-			if (!check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance))
-				return 0;
-			/*
-			 * Stop after the first non-trylock entry,
-			 * as non-trylock entries have added their
-			 * own direct dependencies already, so this
-			 * lock is connected to them indirectly:
-			 */
-			if (!hlock->trylock)
-				break;
-		}
-		depth--;
-		/*
-		 * End of lock-stack?
-		 */
-		if (!depth)
-			break;
-		/*
-		 * Stop the search if we cross into another context:
-		 */
-		if (curr->held_locks[depth].irq_context !=
-				curr->held_locks[depth-1].irq_context)
-			break;
-	}
-	return 1;
-out_bug:
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-		return 0;
-
-	WARN_ON(1);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
 /*
  * Is this the address of a static object:
@@ -1318,6 +677,652 @@
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
 /*
+ * Allocate a lockdep entry. (assumes the graph_lock held, returns
+ * with NULL on failure)
+ */
+static struct lock_list *alloc_list_entry(void)
+{
+	if (nr_list_entries >= MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES) {
+		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
+			return NULL;
+
+		printk("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low!\n");
+		printk("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	return list_entries + nr_list_entries++;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Add a new dependency to the head of the list:
+ */
+static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *class, struct lock_class *this,
+			    struct list_head *head, unsigned long ip, int distance)
+{
+	struct lock_list *entry;
+	/*
+	 * Lock not present yet - get a new dependency struct and
+	 * add it to the list:
+	 */
+	entry = alloc_list_entry();
+	if (!entry)
+		return 0;
+
+	entry->class = this;
+	entry->distance = distance;
+	if (!save_trace(&entry->trace))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since we never remove from the dependency list, the list can
+	 * be walked lockless by other CPUs, it's only allocation
+	 * that must be protected by the spinlock. But this also means
+	 * we must make new entries visible only once writes to the
+	 * entry become visible - hence the RCU op:
+	 */
+	list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->entry, head);
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Recursive, forwards-direction lock-dependency checking, used for
+ * both noncyclic checking and for hardirq-unsafe/softirq-unsafe
+ * checking.
+ *
+ * (to keep the stackframe of the recursive functions small we
+ *  use these global variables, and we also mark various helper
+ *  functions as noinline.)
+ */
+static struct held_lock *check_source, *check_target;
+
+/*
+ * Print a dependency chain entry (this is only done when a deadlock
+ * has been detected):
+ */
+static noinline int
+print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_list *target, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	if (debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+	printk("\n-> #%u", depth);
+	print_lock_name(target->class);
+	printk(":\n");
+	print_stack_trace(&target->trace, 6);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * When a circular dependency is detected, print the
+ * header first:
+ */
+static noinline int
+print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	struct task_struct *curr = current;
+
+	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+
+	printk("\n=======================================================\n");
+	printk(  "[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]\n");
+	print_kernel_version();
+	printk(  "-------------------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
+		curr->comm, curr->pid);
+	print_lock(check_source);
+	printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n");
+	print_lock(check_target);
+	printk("\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n");
+	printk("\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n");
+
+	print_circular_bug_entry(entry, depth);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static noinline int print_circular_bug_tail(void)
+{
+	struct task_struct *curr = current;
+	struct lock_list this;
+
+	if (debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+
+	this.class = check_source->class;
+	if (!save_trace(&this.trace))
+		return 0;
+
+	print_circular_bug_entry(&this, 0);
+
+	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
+	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
+
+	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
+	dump_stack();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#define RECURSION_LIMIT 40
+
+static int noinline print_infinite_recursion_bug(void)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
+		return 0;
+
+	WARN_ON(1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Prove that the dependency graph starting at <entry> can not
+ * lead to <target>. Print an error and return 0 if it does.
+ */
+static noinline int
+check_noncircular(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	struct lock_list *entry;
+
+	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_cyclic_check_recursions);
+	if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
+		max_recursion_depth = depth;
+	if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
+		return print_infinite_recursion_bug();
+	/*
+	 * Check this lock's dependency list:
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_after, entry) {
+		if (entry->class == check_target->class)
+			return print_circular_bug_header(entry, depth+1);
+		debug_atomic_inc(&nr_cyclic_checks);
+		if (!check_noncircular(entry->class, depth+1))
+			return print_circular_bug_entry(entry, depth+1);
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+/*
+ * Forwards and backwards subgraph searching, for the purposes of
+ * proving that two subgraphs can be connected by a new dependency
+ * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency.
+ */
+static enum lock_usage_bit find_usage_bit;
+static struct lock_class *forwards_match, *backwards_match;
+
+/*
+ * Find a node in the forwards-direction dependency sub-graph starting
+ * at <source> that matches <find_usage_bit>.
+ *
+ * Return 2 if such a node exists in the subgraph, and put that node
+ * into <forwards_match>.
+ *
+ * Return 1 otherwise and keep <forwards_match> unchanged.
+ * Return 0 on error.
+ */
+static noinline int
+find_usage_forwards(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	struct lock_list *entry;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
+		max_recursion_depth = depth;
+	if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
+		return print_infinite_recursion_bug();
+
+	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks);
+	if (source->usage_mask & (1 << find_usage_bit)) {
+		forwards_match = source;
+		return 2;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check this lock's dependency list:
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_after, entry) {
+		debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions);
+		ret = find_usage_forwards(entry->class, depth+1);
+		if (ret == 2 || ret == 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Find a node in the backwards-direction dependency sub-graph starting
+ * at <source> that matches <find_usage_bit>.
+ *
+ * Return 2 if such a node exists in the subgraph, and put that node
+ * into <backwards_match>.
+ *
+ * Return 1 otherwise and keep <backwards_match> unchanged.
+ * Return 0 on error.
+ */
+static noinline int
+find_usage_backwards(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	struct lock_list *entry;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!__raw_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock))
+		return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
+
+	if (depth > max_recursion_depth)
+		max_recursion_depth = depth;
+	if (depth >= RECURSION_LIMIT)
+		return print_infinite_recursion_bug();
+
+	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks);
+	if (source->usage_mask & (1 << find_usage_bit)) {
+		backwards_match = source;
+		return 2;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check this lock's dependency list:
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_before, entry) {
+		debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions);
+		ret = find_usage_backwards(entry->class, depth+1);
+		if (ret == 2 || ret == 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int
+print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
+			 struct held_lock *prev,
+			 struct held_lock *next,
+			 enum lock_usage_bit bit1,
+			 enum lock_usage_bit bit2,
+			 const char *irqclass)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+
+	printk("\n======================================================\n");
+	printk(  "[ INFO: %s-safe -> %s-unsafe lock order detected ]\n",
+		irqclass, irqclass);
+	print_kernel_version();
+	printk(  "------------------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] is trying to acquire:\n",
+		curr->comm, curr->pid,
+		curr->hardirq_context, hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
+		curr->softirq_context, softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
+		curr->hardirqs_enabled,
+		curr->softirqs_enabled);
+	print_lock(next);
+
+	printk("\nand this task is already holding:\n");
+	print_lock(prev);
+	printk("which would create a new lock dependency:\n");
+	print_lock_name(prev->class);
+	printk(" ->");
+	print_lock_name(next->class);
+	printk("\n");
+
+	printk("\nbut this new dependency connects a %s-irq-safe lock:\n",
+		irqclass);
+	print_lock_name(backwards_match);
+	printk("\n... which became %s-irq-safe at:\n", irqclass);
+
+	print_stack_trace(backwards_match->usage_traces + bit1, 1);
+
+	printk("\nto a %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
+	print_lock_name(forwards_match);
+	printk("\n... which became %s-irq-unsafe at:\n", irqclass);
+	printk("...");
+
+	print_stack_trace(forwards_match->usage_traces + bit2, 1);
+
+	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
+	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
+
+	printk("\nthe %s-irq-safe lock's dependencies:\n", irqclass);
+	print_lock_dependencies(backwards_match, 0);
+
+	printk("\nthe %s-irq-unsafe lock's dependencies:\n", irqclass);
+	print_lock_dependencies(forwards_match, 0);
+
+	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
+	dump_stack();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
+	    struct held_lock *next, enum lock_usage_bit bit_backwards,
+	    enum lock_usage_bit bit_forwards, const char *irqclass)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	find_usage_bit = bit_backwards;
+	/* fills in <backwards_match> */
+	ret = find_usage_backwards(prev->class, 0);
+	if (!ret || ret == 1)
+		return ret;
+
+	find_usage_bit = bit_forwards;
+	ret = find_usage_forwards(next->class, 0);
+	if (!ret || ret == 1)
+		return ret;
+	/* ret == 2 */
+	return print_bad_irq_dependency(curr, prev, next,
+			bit_backwards, bit_forwards, irqclass);
+}
+
+static int
+check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
+		struct held_lock *next)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe
+	 * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
+	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
+	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
+	 */
+	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ,
+					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS, "hard"))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe-read
+	 * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
+	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
+	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
+	 */
+	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ,
+					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS, "hard-read"))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a softirq-safe
+	 * lock with a softirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
+	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
+	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
+	 */
+	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ,
+					LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS, "soft"))
+		return 0;
+	/*
+	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a softirq-safe-read
+	 * lock with a softirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
+	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
+	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
+	 */
+	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ,
+					LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS, "soft"))
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static void inc_chains(void)
+{
+	if (current->hardirq_context)
+		nr_hardirq_chains++;
+	else {
+		if (current->softirq_context)
+			nr_softirq_chains++;
+		else
+			nr_process_chains++;
+	}
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline int
+check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
+		struct held_lock *next)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static inline void inc_chains(void)
+{
+	nr_process_chains++;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+static int
+print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
+		   struct held_lock *next)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+
+	printk("\n=============================================\n");
+	printk(  "[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]\n");
+	print_kernel_version();
+	printk(  "---------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
+		curr->comm, curr->pid);
+	print_lock(next);
+	printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n");
+	print_lock(prev);
+
+	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
+	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
+
+	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
+	dump_stack();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether we are holding such a class already.
+ *
+ * (Note that this has to be done separately, because the graph cannot
+ * detect such classes of deadlocks.)
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
+ */
+static int
+check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
+	       struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
+{
+	struct held_lock *prev;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
+		prev = curr->held_locks + i;
+		if (prev->class != next->class)
+			continue;
+		/*
+		 * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
+		 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
+		 */
+		if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
+			return 2;
+		return print_deadlock_bug(curr, prev, next);
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * There was a chain-cache miss, and we are about to add a new dependency
+ * to a previous lock. We recursively validate the following rules:
+ *
+ *  - would the adding of the <prev> -> <next> dependency create a
+ *    circular dependency in the graph? [== circular deadlock]
+ *
+ *  - does the new prev->next dependency connect any hardirq-safe lock
+ *    (in the full backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>) with any
+ *    hardirq-unsafe lock (in the full forwards-subgraph starting at
+ *    <next>)? [== illegal lock inversion with hardirq contexts]
+ *
+ *  - does the new prev->next dependency connect any softirq-safe lock
+ *    (in the full backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>) with any
+ *    softirq-unsafe lock (in the full forwards-subgraph starting at
+ *    <next>)? [== illegal lock inversion with softirq contexts]
+ *
+ * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock.
+ *
+ * Then if all the validations pass, we add the forwards and backwards
+ * dependency.
+ */
+static int
+check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
+	       struct held_lock *next, int distance)
+{
+	struct lock_list *entry;
+	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not
+	 * create a circular dependency in the graph. (We do this by
+	 * forward-recursing into the graph starting at <next>, and
+	 * checking whether we can reach <prev>.)
+	 *
+	 * We are using global variables to control the recursion, to
+	 * keep the stackframe size of the recursive functions low:
+	 */
+	check_source = next;
+	check_target = prev;
+	if (!(check_noncircular(next->class, 0)))
+		return print_circular_bug_tail();
+
+	if (!check_prev_add_irq(curr, prev, next))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * For recursive read-locks we do all the dependency checks,
+	 * but we dont store read-triggered dependencies (only
+	 * write-triggered dependencies). This ensures that only the
+	 * write-side dependencies matter, and that if for example a
+	 * write-lock never takes any other locks, then the reads are
+	 * equivalent to a NOP.
+	 */
+	if (next->read == 2 || prev->read == 2)
+		return 1;
+	/*
+	 * Is the <prev> -> <next> dependency already present?
+	 *
+	 * (this may occur even though this is a new chain: consider
+	 *  e.g. the L1 -> L2 -> L3 -> L4 and the L5 -> L1 -> L2 -> L3
+	 *  chains - the second one will be new, but L1 already has
+	 *  L2 added to its dependency list, due to the first chain.)
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry(entry, &prev->class->locks_after, entry) {
+		if (entry->class == next->class) {
+			if (distance == 1)
+				entry->distance = 1;
+			return 2;
+		}
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Ok, all validations passed, add the new lock
+	 * to the previous lock's dependency list:
+	 */
+	ret = add_lock_to_list(prev->class, next->class,
+			       &prev->class->locks_after, next->acquire_ip, distance);
+
+	if (!ret)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = add_lock_to_list(next->class, prev->class,
+			       &next->class->locks_before, next->acquire_ip, distance);
+	if (!ret)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Debugging printouts:
+	 */
+	if (verbose(prev->class) || verbose(next->class)) {
+		graph_unlock();
+		printk("\n new dependency: ");
+		print_lock_name(prev->class);
+		printk(" => ");
+		print_lock_name(next->class);
+		printk("\n");
+		dump_stack();
+		return graph_lock();
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Add the dependency to all directly-previous locks that are 'relevant'.
+ * The ones that are relevant are (in increasing distance from curr):
+ * all consecutive trylock entries and the final non-trylock entry - or
+ * the end of this context's lock-chain - whichever comes first.
+ */
+static int
+check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
+{
+	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+	struct held_lock *hlock;
+
+	/*
+	 * Debugging checks.
+	 *
+	 * Depth must not be zero for a non-head lock:
+	 */
+	if (!depth)
+		goto out_bug;
+	/*
+	 * At least two relevant locks must exist for this
+	 * to be a head:
+	 */
+	if (curr->held_locks[depth].irq_context !=
+			curr->held_locks[depth-1].irq_context)
+		goto out_bug;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		int distance = curr->lockdep_depth - depth + 1;
+		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth-1;
+		/*
+		 * Only non-recursive-read entries get new dependencies
+		 * added:
+		 */
+		if (hlock->read != 2) {
+			if (!check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance))
+				return 0;
+			/*
+			 * Stop after the first non-trylock entry,
+			 * as non-trylock entries have added their
+			 * own direct dependencies already, so this
+			 * lock is connected to them indirectly:
+			 */
+			if (!hlock->trylock)
+				break;
+		}
+		depth--;
+		/*
+		 * End of lock-stack?
+		 */
+		if (!depth)
+			break;
+		/*
+		 * Stop the search if we cross into another context:
+		 */
+		if (curr->held_locks[depth].irq_context !=
+				curr->held_locks[depth-1].irq_context)
+			break;
+	}
+	return 1;
+out_bug:
+	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
+		return 0;
+
+	WARN_ON(1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
+static struct lock_chain lock_chains[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS];
+
+/*
  * Look up a dependency chain. If the key is not present yet then
  * add it and return 1 - in this case the new dependency chain is
  * validated. If the key is already hashed, return 0.
@@ -1376,21 +1381,71 @@
 	chain->chain_key = chain_key;
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&chain->entry, hash_head);
 	debug_atomic_inc(&chain_lookup_misses);
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-	if (current->hardirq_context)
-		nr_hardirq_chains++;
-	else {
-		if (current->softirq_context)
-			nr_softirq_chains++;
-		else
-			nr_process_chains++;
-	}
-#else
-	nr_process_chains++;
-#endif
+	inc_chains();
 
 	return 1;
 }
+
+static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
+	       	struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
+	 * does not add new dependencies, because trylock can be done
+	 * in any order.
+	 *
+	 * We look up the chain_key and do the O(N^2) check and update of
+	 * the dependencies only if this is a new dependency chain.
+	 * (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires
+	 * graph_lock for us)
+	 */
+	if (!hlock->trylock && (hlock->check == 2) &&
+			lookup_chain_cache(curr->curr_chain_key, hlock->class)) {
+		/*
+		 * Check whether last held lock:
+		 *
+		 * - is irq-safe, if this lock is irq-unsafe
+		 * - is softirq-safe, if this lock is hardirq-unsafe
+		 *
+		 * And check whether the new lock's dependency graph
+		 * could lead back to the previous lock.
+		 *
+		 * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock. If
+		 * All validations
+		 */
+		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, lock, hlock->read);
+
+		if (!ret)
+			return 0;
+		/*
+		 * Mark recursive read, as we jump over it when
+		 * building dependencies (just like we jump over
+		 * trylock entries):
+		 */
+		if (ret == 2)
+			hlock->read = 2;
+		/*
+		 * Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
+		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
+		 */
+		if (!chain_head && ret != 2)
+			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
+				return 0;
+		graph_unlock();
+	} else
+		/* after lookup_chain_cache(): */
+		if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
+			return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+#else
+static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
+	       	struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock,
+		int chain_head)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
 #endif
 
 /*
@@ -1436,6 +1491,57 @@
 #endif
 }
 
+static int
+print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		enum lock_usage_bit prev_bit, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+{
+	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
+		return 0;
+
+	printk("\n=================================\n");
+	printk(  "[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]\n");
+	print_kernel_version();
+	printk(  "---------------------------------\n");
+
+	printk("inconsistent {%s} -> {%s} usage.\n",
+		usage_str[prev_bit], usage_str[new_bit]);
+
+	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] takes:\n",
+		curr->comm, curr->pid,
+		trace_hardirq_context(curr), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
+		trace_softirq_context(curr), softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
+		trace_hardirqs_enabled(curr),
+		trace_softirqs_enabled(curr));
+	print_lock(this);
+
+	printk("{%s} state was registered at:\n", usage_str[prev_bit]);
+	print_stack_trace(this->class->usage_traces + prev_bit, 1);
+
+	print_irqtrace_events(curr);
+	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
+	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
+
+	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
+	dump_stack();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Print out an error if an invalid bit is set:
+ */
+static inline int
+valid_state(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+	    enum lock_usage_bit new_bit, enum lock_usage_bit bad_bit)
+{
+	if (unlikely(this->class->usage_mask & (1 << bad_bit)))
+		return print_usage_bug(curr, this, bad_bit, new_bit);
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 
 /*
@@ -1529,90 +1635,30 @@
 	print_ip_sym(curr->softirq_disable_ip);
 }
 
-#endif
-
-static int
-print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		enum lock_usage_bit prev_bit, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+static int hardirq_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 {
-	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
-		return 0;
-
-	printk("\n=================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]\n");
-	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "---------------------------------\n");
-
-	printk("inconsistent {%s} -> {%s} usage.\n",
-		usage_str[prev_bit], usage_str[new_bit]);
-
-	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] takes:\n",
-		curr->comm, curr->pid,
-		trace_hardirq_context(curr), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
-		trace_softirq_context(curr), softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
-		trace_hardirqs_enabled(curr),
-		trace_softirqs_enabled(curr));
-	print_lock(this);
-
-	printk("{%s} state was registered at:\n", usage_str[prev_bit]);
-	print_stack_trace(this->class->usage_traces + prev_bit, 1);
-
-	print_irqtrace_events(curr);
-	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
-	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
-
-	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
-	dump_stack();
-
+#if HARDIRQ_VERBOSE
+	return class_filter(class);
+#endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Print out an error if an invalid bit is set:
- */
-static inline int
-valid_state(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-	    enum lock_usage_bit new_bit, enum lock_usage_bit bad_bit)
+static int softirq_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 {
-	if (unlikely(this->class->usage_mask & (1 << bad_bit)))
-		return print_usage_bug(curr, this, bad_bit, new_bit);
-	return 1;
+#if SOFTIRQ_VERBOSE
+	return class_filter(class);
+#endif
+	return 0;
 }
 
 #define STRICT_READ_CHECKS	1
 
-/*
- * Mark a lock with a usage bit, and validate the state transition:
- */
-static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
-	unsigned int new_mask = 1 << new_bit, ret = 1;
+	int ret = 1;
 
-	/*
-	 * If already set then do not dirty the cacheline,
-	 * nor do any checks:
-	 */
-	if (likely(this->class->usage_mask & new_mask))
-		return 1;
-
-	if (!graph_lock())
-		return 0;
-	/*
-	 * Make sure we didnt race:
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(this->class->usage_mask & new_mask)) {
-		graph_unlock();
-		return 1;
-	}
-
-	this->class->usage_mask |= new_mask;
-
-	if (!save_trace(this->class->usage_traces + new_bit))
-		return 0;
-
-	switch (new_bit) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
+	switch(new_bit) {
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
 		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS))
 			return 0;
@@ -1771,37 +1817,14 @@
 		if (softirq_verbose(this->class))
 			ret = 2;
 		break;
-#endif
-	case LOCK_USED:
-		/*
-		 * Add it to the global list of classes:
-		 */
-		list_add_tail_rcu(&this->class->lock_entry, &all_lock_classes);
-		debug_atomic_dec(&nr_unused_locks);
-		break;
 	default:
-		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
-			return 0;
 		WARN_ON(1);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	graph_unlock();
-
-	/*
-	 * We must printk outside of the graph_lock:
-	 */
-	if (ret == 2) {
-		printk("\nmarked lock as {%s}:\n", usage_str[new_bit]);
-		print_lock(this);
-		print_irqtrace_events(curr);
-		dump_stack();
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
 /*
  * Mark all held locks with a usage bit:
  */
@@ -1984,9 +2007,176 @@
 		debug_atomic_inc(&redundant_softirqs_off);
 }
 
+static int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If non-trylock use in a hardirq or softirq context, then
+	 * mark the lock as used in these contexts:
+	 */
+	if (!hlock->trylock) {
+		if (hlock->read) {
+			if (curr->hardirq_context)
+				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
+						LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ))
+					return 0;
+			if (curr->softirq_context)
+				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
+						LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ))
+					return 0;
+		} else {
+			if (curr->hardirq_context)
+				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ))
+					return 0;
+			if (curr->softirq_context)
+				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ))
+					return 0;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!hlock->hardirqs_off) {
+		if (hlock->read) {
+			if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
+					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS_READ))
+				return 0;
+			if (curr->softirqs_enabled)
+				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
+						LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS_READ))
+					return 0;
+		} else {
+			if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
+					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS))
+				return 0;
+			if (curr->softirqs_enabled)
+				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
+						LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS))
+					return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
+		struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	unsigned int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+
+	/*
+	 * Keep track of points where we cross into an interrupt context:
+	 */
+	hlock->irq_context = 2*(curr->hardirq_context ? 1 : 0) +
+				curr->softirq_context;
+	if (depth) {
+		struct held_lock *prev_hlock;
+
+		prev_hlock = curr->held_locks + depth-1;
+		/*
+		 * If we cross into another context, reset the
+		 * hash key (this also prevents the checking and the
+		 * adding of the dependency to 'prev'):
+		 */
+		if (prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
+			return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline
+int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+{
+	WARN_ON(1);
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static inline int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr,
+		struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
+		struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif
 
 /*
+ * Mark a lock with a usage bit, and validate the state transition:
+ */
+static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
+{
+	unsigned int new_mask = 1 << new_bit, ret = 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * If already set then do not dirty the cacheline,
+	 * nor do any checks:
+	 */
+	if (likely(this->class->usage_mask & new_mask))
+		return 1;
+
+	if (!graph_lock())
+		return 0;
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we didnt race:
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(this->class->usage_mask & new_mask)) {
+		graph_unlock();
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	this->class->usage_mask |= new_mask;
+
+	if (!save_trace(this->class->usage_traces + new_bit))
+		return 0;
+
+	switch (new_bit) {
+	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
+	case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
+	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
+	case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS_READ:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS_READ:
+		ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit);
+		if (!ret)
+			return 0;
+		break;
+	case LOCK_USED:
+		/*
+		 * Add it to the global list of classes:
+		 */
+		list_add_tail_rcu(&this->class->lock_entry, &all_lock_classes);
+		debug_atomic_dec(&nr_unused_locks);
+		break;
+	default:
+		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
+			return 0;
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	graph_unlock();
+
+	/*
+	 * We must printk outside of the graph_lock:
+	 */
+	if (ret == 2) {
+		printk("\nmarked lock as {%s}:\n", usage_str[new_bit]);
+		print_lock(this);
+		print_irqtrace_events(curr);
+		dump_stack();
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
  * Initialize a lock instance's lock-class mapping info:
  */
 void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
@@ -2082,56 +2272,13 @@
 	hlock->check = check;
 	hlock->hardirqs_off = hardirqs_off;
 
-	if (check != 2)
-		goto out_calc_hash;
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-	/*
-	 * If non-trylock use in a hardirq or softirq context, then
-	 * mark the lock as used in these contexts:
-	 */
-	if (!trylock) {
-		if (read) {
-			if (curr->hardirq_context)
-				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
-						LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ))
-					return 0;
-			if (curr->softirq_context)
-				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
-						LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ))
-					return 0;
-		} else {
-			if (curr->hardirq_context)
-				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ))
-					return 0;
-			if (curr->softirq_context)
-				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ))
-					return 0;
-		}
-	}
-	if (!hardirqs_off) {
-		if (read) {
-			if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
-					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS_READ))
-				return 0;
-			if (curr->softirqs_enabled)
-				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
-						LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS_READ))
-					return 0;
-		} else {
-			if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
-					LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQS))
-				return 0;
-			if (curr->softirqs_enabled)
-				if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
-						LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQS))
-					return 0;
-		}
-	}
-#endif
+	if (check == 2 && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* mark it as used: */
 	if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED))
 		return 0;
-out_calc_hash:
+
 	/*
 	 * Calculate the chain hash: it's the combined has of all the
 	 * lock keys along the dependency chain. We save the hash value
@@ -2154,77 +2301,15 @@
 	}
 
 	hlock->prev_chain_key = chain_key;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
-	/*
-	 * Keep track of points where we cross into an interrupt context:
-	 */
-	hlock->irq_context = 2*(curr->hardirq_context ? 1 : 0) +
-				curr->softirq_context;
-	if (depth) {
-		struct held_lock *prev_hlock;
-
-		prev_hlock = curr->held_locks + depth-1;
-		/*
-		 * If we cross into another context, reset the
-		 * hash key (this also prevents the checking and the
-		 * adding of the dependency to 'prev'):
-		 */
-		if (prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context) {
-			chain_key = 0;
-			chain_head = 1;
-		}
+	if (separate_irq_context(curr, hlock)) {
+		chain_key = 0;
+		chain_head = 1;
 	}
-#endif
 	chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, id);
 	curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
 
-	/*
-	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
-	 * does not add new dependencies, because trylock can be done
-	 * in any order.
-	 *
-	 * We look up the chain_key and do the O(N^2) check and update of
-	 * the dependencies only if this is a new dependency chain.
-	 * (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires
-	 * graph_lock for us)
-	 */
-	if (!trylock && (check == 2) && lookup_chain_cache(chain_key, class)) {
-		/*
-		 * Check whether last held lock:
-		 *
-		 * - is irq-safe, if this lock is irq-unsafe
-		 * - is softirq-safe, if this lock is hardirq-unsafe
-		 *
-		 * And check whether the new lock's dependency graph
-		 * could lead back to the previous lock.
-		 *
-		 * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock. If
-		 * All validations
-		 */
-		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, lock, read);
-
-		if (!ret)
-			return 0;
-		/*
-		 * Mark recursive read, as we jump over it when
-		 * building dependencies (just like we jump over
-		 * trylock entries):
-		 */
-		if (ret == 2)
-			hlock->read = 2;
-		/*
-		 * Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
-		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
-		 */
-		if (!chain_head && ret != 2)
-			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
-				return 0;
-		graph_unlock();
-	} else
-		/* after lookup_chain_cache(): */
-		if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
-			return 0;
+	if (!validate_chain(curr, lock, hlock, chain_head))
+		return 0;
 
 	curr->lockdep_depth++;
 	check_chain_key(curr);