PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
True, it's often used in return statements, but after much bikeshedding
it's probably better to have an explicit name.
(I tried just putting the IS_ERR check inside PTR_ERR itself and gcc
usually generated no more code. But that clashes current expectations
of how PTR_ERR behaves, so having a separate function is better).
Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Suggested-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h
index 221fcfb..15f92e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/err.h
+++ b/include/linux/err.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
return (void *) ptr;
}
-static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr)
+static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr)
{
if (IS_ERR(ptr))
return PTR_ERR(ptr);
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@
return 0;
}
+/* Deprecated */
+#define PTR_RET(p) PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p)
+
#endif
#endif /* _LINUX_ERR_H */