[PATCH] list: use list_replace_init() instead of list_splice_init()
list_splice_init(list, head) does unneeded job if it is known that
list_empty(head) == 1. We can use list_replace_init() instead.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index 9e49dee..3bf0e9ed 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -419,10 +419,10 @@
spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);
while (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->timer_jiffies)) {
- struct list_head work_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(work_list);
+ struct list_head work_list;
struct list_head *head = &work_list;
int index = base->timer_jiffies & TVR_MASK;
-
+
/*
* Cascade timers:
*/
@@ -431,8 +431,8 @@
(!cascade(base, &base->tv3, INDEX(1))) &&
!cascade(base, &base->tv4, INDEX(2)))
cascade(base, &base->tv5, INDEX(3));
- ++base->timer_jiffies;
- list_splice_init(base->tv1.vec + index, &work_list);
+ ++base->timer_jiffies;
+ list_replace_init(base->tv1.vec + index, &work_list);
while (!list_empty(head)) {
void (*fn)(unsigned long);
unsigned long data;