[PATCH] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic
The condition for no context in do_exception checks for hard and soft
interrupts by using in_interrupt() but not for preemption. This is bad for
the users of __copy_from/to_user_inatomic because the fault handler might call
schedule although the preemption count is != 0. Use in_atomic() instead
in_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index 80306bc..75fde94 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
* we are not in an interrupt and that there is a
* user context.
*/
- if (user_address == 0 || in_interrupt() || !mm)
+ if (user_address == 0 || in_atomic() || !mm)
goto no_context;
/*