netlabel: Fix some sparse warnings
Fix a few sparse warnings. One dealt with a RCU lock being held on error,
another dealt with an improper type caused by a signed/unsigned mixup while
the rest appeared to be caused by using rcu_dereference() in a
list_for_each_entry_rcu() call. The latter probably isn't a big deal, but
I derive a certain pleasure from knowing that the net/netlabel is nice and
clean.
Thanks to James Morris for pointing out the issues and demonstrating how
to run sparse.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c
index 643c032..dc42206 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_domainhash.c
@@ -115,13 +115,13 @@
static struct netlbl_dom_map *netlbl_domhsh_search(const char *domain)
{
u32 bkt;
+ struct list_head *bkt_list;
struct netlbl_dom_map *iter;
if (domain != NULL) {
bkt = netlbl_domhsh_hash(domain);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(iter,
- &rcu_dereference(netlbl_domhsh)->tbl[bkt],
- list)
+ bkt_list = &rcu_dereference(netlbl_domhsh)->tbl[bkt];
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(iter, bkt_list, list)
if (iter->valid && strcmp(iter->domain, domain) == 0)
return iter;
}
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@
{
int ret_val = -ENOENT;
u32 iter_bkt;
+ struct list_head *iter_list;
struct netlbl_dom_map *iter_entry;
u32 chain_cnt = 0;
@@ -417,9 +418,8 @@
for (iter_bkt = *skip_bkt;
iter_bkt < rcu_dereference(netlbl_domhsh)->size;
iter_bkt++, chain_cnt = 0) {
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(iter_entry,
- &rcu_dereference(netlbl_domhsh)->tbl[iter_bkt],
- list)
+ iter_list = &rcu_dereference(netlbl_domhsh)->tbl[iter_bkt];
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(iter_entry, iter_list, list)
if (iter_entry->valid) {
if (chain_cnt++ < *skip_chain)
continue;