ufs: the offsets ufs_block_to_path() puts into array are not sector_t
type makes no sense - those are indices in block number arrays, not
block numbers. And no, UFS is not likely to grow indirect blocks with
4Gpointers in them...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/ufs/inode.c b/fs/ufs/inode.c
index ec758ed..4367218 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/inode.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
#include "swab.h"
#include "util.h"
-static int ufs_block_to_path(struct inode *inode, sector_t i_block, sector_t offsets[4])
+static int ufs_block_to_path(struct inode *inode, sector_t i_block, unsigned offsets[4])
{
struct ufs_sb_private_info *uspi = UFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_uspi;
int ptrs = uspi->s_apb;
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
while (--depth) {
__fs32 *ptr;
struct buffer_head *bh;
- sector_t n = *p++;
+ unsigned n = *p++;
bh = sb_bread(sb, uspi->s_sbbase +
fs32_to_cpu(sb, q->key32) + (n>>shift));
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
while (--depth) {
__fs64 *ptr;
struct buffer_head *bh;
- sector_t n = *p++;
+ unsigned n = *p++;
bh = sb_bread(sb, uspi->s_sbbase +
fs64_to_cpu(sb, q->key64) + (n>>shift));