| commit | 3d86e352c077152a9719ae5ccdf89f1ae616ff6c | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | Tue Aug 29 09:41:56 2017 -0700 |
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | Tue Aug 29 09:41:56 2017 -0700 |
| tree | 785f74d0482cc77e6ed699e44ce42b41499b4104 | |
| parent | 6c766db60b6179f251812437d44e9c1b4e236f36 [diff] | |
| parent | a6f57028d60328c06ea23982464de2f2e4a9ea3f [diff] |
Merge branch 'addrlabel-no-rtnl-locking' Florian Westphal says: ==================== addrlabel: don't use rtnl locking addrlabel doesn't appear to require rtnl lock as the addrlabel table uses a spinlock to serialize add/delete operations. Also, entries are reference counted so it should be safe to call the rtnl ops without the rtnl mutex. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>