reiserfs: don't lock journal_init()
journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem
is involved there. journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be
reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there. Just keep the
it around these two calls for safety.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index cce8e87..c3cf54f 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -2678,16 +2678,10 @@
char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
int ret;
- /*
- * Unlock here to avoid various RECLAIM-FS-ON <-> IN-RECLAIM-FS
- * dependency inversion warnings.
- */
- reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
journal = SB_JOURNAL(sb) = vzalloc(sizeof(struct reiserfs_journal));
if (!journal) {
reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-1256",
"unable to get memory for journal structure");
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
return 1;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_bitmap_nodes);
@@ -2695,10 +2689,8 @@
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_working_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_journal_list);
journal->j_persistent_trans = 0;
- ret = reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(sb, journal->j_list_bitmap,
- reiserfs_bmap_count(sb));
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
- if (ret)
+ if (reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(sb, journal->j_list_bitmap,
+ reiserfs_bmap_count(sb)))
goto free_and_return;
allocate_bitmap_nodes(sb);
@@ -2727,27 +2719,11 @@
goto free_and_return;
}
- /*
- * We need to unlock here to avoid creating the following
- * dependency:
- * reiserfs_lock -> sysfs_mutex
- * Because the reiserfs mmap path creates the following dependency:
- * mm->mmap -> reiserfs_lock, hence we have
- * mm->mmap -> reiserfs_lock ->sysfs_mutex
- * This would ends up in a circular dependency with sysfs readdir path
- * which does sysfs_mutex -> mm->mmap_sem
- * This is fine because the reiserfs lock is useless in mount path,
- * at least until we call journal_begin. We keep it for paranoid
- * reasons.
- */
- reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
if (journal_init_dev(sb, journal, j_dev_name) != 0) {
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
reiserfs_warning(sb, "sh-462",
"unable to initialize jornal device");
goto free_and_return;
}
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
rs = SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(sb);
@@ -2829,9 +2805,7 @@
journal->j_mount_id = 10;
journal->j_state = 0;
atomic_set(&(journal->j_jlock), 0);
- reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
journal->j_cnode_free_list = allocate_cnodes(num_cnodes);
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
journal->j_cnode_free_orig = journal->j_cnode_free_list;
journal->j_cnode_free = journal->j_cnode_free_list ? num_cnodes : 0;
journal->j_cnode_used = 0;
@@ -2848,24 +2822,37 @@
init_journal_hash(sb);
jl = journal->j_current_jl;
+
+ /*
+ * get_list_bitmap() may call flush_commit_list() which
+ * requires the lock. Calling flush_commit_list() shouldn't happen
+ * this early but I like to be paranoid.
+ */
+ reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
jl->j_list_bitmap = get_list_bitmap(sb, jl);
+ reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
if (!jl->j_list_bitmap) {
reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-2005",
"get_list_bitmap failed for journal list 0");
goto free_and_return;
}
- if (journal_read(sb) < 0) {
+
+ /*
+ * Journal_read needs to be inspected in order to push down
+ * the lock further inside (or even remove it).
+ */
+ reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
+ ret = journal_read(sb);
+ reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+ if (ret < 0) {
reiserfs_warning(sb, "reiserfs-2006",
"Replay Failure, unable to mount");
goto free_and_return;
}
reiserfs_mounted_fs_count++;
- if (reiserfs_mounted_fs_count <= 1) {
- reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+ if (reiserfs_mounted_fs_count <= 1)
commit_wq = alloc_workqueue("reiserfs", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
- }
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&journal->j_work, flush_async_commits);
journal->j_work_sb = sb;