diff --git a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
index c29ffa1..787ab4b 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
-/*P:500 Just as userspace programs request kernel operations through a system
+/*P:500
+ * Just as userspace programs request kernel operations through a system
  * call, the Guest requests Host operations through a "hypercall".  You might
  * notice this nomenclature doesn't really follow any logic, but the name has
  * been around for long enough that we're stuck with it.  As you'd expect, this
- * code is basically a one big switch statement. :*/
+ * code is basically a one big switch statement.
+:*/
 
 /*  Copyright (C) 2006 Rusty Russell IBM Corporation
 
@@ -28,30 +30,41 @@
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include "lg.h"
 
-/*H:120 This is the core hypercall routine: where the Guest gets what it wants.
- * Or gets killed.  Or, in the case of LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, both. */
+/*H:120
+ * This is the core hypercall routine: where the Guest gets what it wants.
+ * Or gets killed.  Or, in the case of LHCALL_SHUTDOWN, both.
+ */
 static void do_hcall(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct hcall_args *args)
 {
 	switch (args->arg0) {
 	case LHCALL_FLUSH_ASYNC:
-		/* This call does nothing, except by breaking out of the Guest
-		 * it makes us process all the asynchronous hypercalls. */
+		/*
+		 * This call does nothing, except by breaking out of the Guest
+		 * it makes us process all the asynchronous hypercalls.
+		 */
 		break;
 	case LHCALL_SEND_INTERRUPTS:
-		/* This call does nothing too, but by breaking out of the Guest
-		 * it makes us process any pending interrupts. */
+		/*
+		 * This call does nothing too, but by breaking out of the Guest
+		 * it makes us process any pending interrupts.
+		 */
 		break;
 	case LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT:
-		/* You can't get here unless you're already initialized.  Don't
-		 * do that. */
+		/*
+		 * You can't get here unless you're already initialized.  Don't
+		 * do that.
+		 */
 		kill_guest(cpu, "already have lguest_data");
 		break;
 	case LHCALL_SHUTDOWN: {
-		/* Shutdown is such a trivial hypercall that we do it in four
-		 * lines right here. */
 		char msg[128];
-		/* If the lgread fails, it will call kill_guest() itself; the
-		 * kill_guest() with the message will be ignored. */
+		/*
+		 * Shutdown is such a trivial hypercall that we do it in four
+		 * lines right here.
+		 *
+		 * If the lgread fails, it will call kill_guest() itself; the
+		 * kill_guest() with the message will be ignored.
+		 */
 		__lgread(cpu, msg, args->arg1, sizeof(msg));
 		msg[sizeof(msg)-1] = '\0';
 		kill_guest(cpu, "CRASH: %s", msg);
@@ -60,16 +73,17 @@
 		break;
 	}
 	case LHCALL_FLUSH_TLB:
-		/* FLUSH_TLB comes in two flavors, depending on the
-		 * argument: */
+		/* FLUSH_TLB comes in two flavors, depending on the argument: */
 		if (args->arg1)
 			guest_pagetable_clear_all(cpu);
 		else
 			guest_pagetable_flush_user(cpu);
 		break;
 
-	/* All these calls simply pass the arguments through to the right
-	 * routines. */
+	/*
+	 * All these calls simply pass the arguments through to the right
+	 * routines.
+	 */
 	case LHCALL_NEW_PGTABLE:
 		guest_new_pagetable(cpu, args->arg1);
 		break;
@@ -112,15 +126,16 @@
 			kill_guest(cpu, "Bad hypercall %li\n", args->arg0);
 	}
 }
-/*:*/
 
-/*H:124 Asynchronous hypercalls are easy: we just look in the array in the
+/*H:124
+ * Asynchronous hypercalls are easy: we just look in the array in the
  * Guest's "struct lguest_data" to see if any new ones are marked "ready".
  *
  * We are careful to do these in order: obviously we respect the order the
  * Guest put them in the ring, but we also promise the Guest that they will
  * happen before any normal hypercall (which is why we check this before
- * checking for a normal hcall). */
+ * checking for a normal hcall).
+ */
 static void do_async_hcalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
 {
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -133,22 +148,28 @@
 	/* We process "struct lguest_data"s hcalls[] ring once. */
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(st); i++) {
 		struct hcall_args args;
-		/* We remember where we were up to from last time.  This makes
+		/*
+		 * We remember where we were up to from last time.  This makes
 		 * sure that the hypercalls are done in the order the Guest
-		 * places them in the ring. */
+		 * places them in the ring.
+		 */
 		unsigned int n = cpu->next_hcall;
 
 		/* 0xFF means there's no call here (yet). */
 		if (st[n] == 0xFF)
 			break;
 
-		/* OK, we have hypercall.  Increment the "next_hcall" cursor,
-		 * and wrap back to 0 if we reach the end. */
+		/*
+		 * OK, we have hypercall.  Increment the "next_hcall" cursor,
+		 * and wrap back to 0 if we reach the end.
+		 */
 		if (++cpu->next_hcall == LHCALL_RING_SIZE)
 			cpu->next_hcall = 0;
 
-		/* Copy the hypercall arguments into a local copy of
-		 * the hcall_args struct. */
+		/*
+		 * Copy the hypercall arguments into a local copy of the
+		 * hcall_args struct.
+		 */
 		if (copy_from_user(&args, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->hcalls[n],
 				   sizeof(struct hcall_args))) {
 			kill_guest(cpu, "Fetching async hypercalls");
@@ -164,19 +185,25 @@
 			break;
 		}
 
-		/* Stop doing hypercalls if they want to notify the Launcher:
-		 * it needs to service this first. */
+		/*
+		 * Stop doing hypercalls if they want to notify the Launcher:
+		 * it needs to service this first.
+		 */
 		if (cpu->pending_notify)
 			break;
 	}
 }
 
-/* Last of all, we look at what happens first of all.  The very first time the
- * Guest makes a hypercall, we end up here to set things up: */
+/*
+ * Last of all, we look at what happens first of all.  The very first time the
+ * Guest makes a hypercall, we end up here to set things up:
+ */
 static void initialize(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
 {
-	/* You can't do anything until you're initialized.  The Guest knows the
-	 * rules, so we're unforgiving here. */
+	/*
+	 * You can't do anything until you're initialized.  The Guest knows the
+	 * rules, so we're unforgiving here.
+	 */
 	if (cpu->hcall->arg0 != LHCALL_LGUEST_INIT) {
 		kill_guest(cpu, "hypercall %li before INIT", cpu->hcall->arg0);
 		return;
@@ -185,32 +212,40 @@
 	if (lguest_arch_init_hypercalls(cpu))
 		kill_guest(cpu, "bad guest page %p", cpu->lg->lguest_data);
 
-	/* The Guest tells us where we're not to deliver interrupts by putting
-	 * the range of addresses into "struct lguest_data". */
+	/*
+	 * The Guest tells us where we're not to deliver interrupts by putting
+	 * the range of addresses into "struct lguest_data".
+	 */
 	if (get_user(cpu->lg->noirq_start, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->noirq_start)
 	    || get_user(cpu->lg->noirq_end, &cpu->lg->lguest_data->noirq_end))
 		kill_guest(cpu, "bad guest page %p", cpu->lg->lguest_data);
 
-	/* We write the current time into the Guest's data page once so it can
-	 * set its clock. */
+	/*
+	 * We write the current time into the Guest's data page once so it can
+	 * set its clock.
+	 */
 	write_timestamp(cpu);
 
 	/* page_tables.c will also do some setup. */
 	page_table_guest_data_init(cpu);
 
-	/* This is the one case where the above accesses might have been the
+	/*
+	 * This is the one case where the above accesses might have been the
 	 * first write to a Guest page.  This may have caused a copy-on-write
 	 * fault, but the old page might be (read-only) in the Guest
-	 * pagetable. */
+	 * pagetable.
+	 */
 	guest_pagetable_clear_all(cpu);
 }
 /*:*/
 
-/*M:013 If a Guest reads from a page (so creates a mapping) that it has never
+/*M:013
+ * If a Guest reads from a page (so creates a mapping) that it has never
  * written to, and then the Launcher writes to it (ie. the output of a virtual
  * device), the Guest will still see the old page.  In practice, this never
  * happens: why would the Guest read a page which it has never written to?  But
- * a similar scenario might one day bite us, so it's worth mentioning. :*/
+ * a similar scenario might one day bite us, so it's worth mentioning.
+:*/
 
 /*H:100
  * Hypercalls
@@ -229,17 +264,22 @@
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/* The Guest has initialized.
+	/*
+	 * The Guest has initialized.
 	 *
-	 * Look in the hypercall ring for the async hypercalls: */
+	 * Look in the hypercall ring for the async hypercalls:
+	 */
 	do_async_hcalls(cpu);
 
-	/* If we stopped reading the hypercall ring because the Guest did a
+	/*
+	 * If we stopped reading the hypercall ring because the Guest did a
 	 * NOTIFY to the Launcher, we want to return now.  Otherwise we do
-	 * the hypercall. */
+	 * the hypercall.
+	 */
 	if (!cpu->pending_notify) {
 		do_hcall(cpu, cpu->hcall);
-		/* Tricky point: we reset the hcall pointer to mark the
+		/*
+		 * Tricky point: we reset the hcall pointer to mark the
 		 * hypercall as "done".  We use the hcall pointer rather than
 		 * the trap number to indicate a hypercall is pending.
 		 * Normally it doesn't matter: the Guest will run again and
@@ -248,13 +288,16 @@
 		 * However, if we are signalled or the Guest sends I/O to the
 		 * Launcher, the run_guest() loop will exit without running the
 		 * Guest.  When it comes back it would try to re-run the
-		 * hypercall.  Finding that bug sucked. */
+		 * hypercall.  Finding that bug sucked.
+		 */
 		cpu->hcall = NULL;
 	}
 }
 
-/* This routine supplies the Guest with time: it's used for wallclock time at
- * initial boot and as a rough time source if the TSC isn't available. */
+/*
+ * This routine supplies the Guest with time: it's used for wallclock time at
+ * initial boot and as a rough time source if the TSC isn't available.
+ */
 void write_timestamp(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
 {
 	struct timespec now;