gpiolib: separation of pin concerns
The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.
So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.
This is done by:
- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
reliably check whether this succeeds.
- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
purpose-specific.
- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
gpiochip_add_pin_range().
Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h
index 434e5a9..4a58428 100644
--- a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h
+++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h
@@ -141,16 +141,13 @@
struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range);
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-extern struct pinctrl_dev *of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range(struct device_node *np,
- struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range);
+extern struct pinctrl_dev *of_pinctrl_get(struct device_node *np);
#else
static inline
-struct pinctrl_dev *of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range(struct device_node *np,
- struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range)
+struct pinctrl_dev *of_pinctrl_get(struct device_node *np)
{
return NULL;
}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
extern const char *pinctrl_dev_get_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev);