[PATCH] sanitize ->permission() prototype
* kill nameidata * argument; map the 3 bits in ->flags anybody cares
about to new MAY_... ones and pass with the mask.
* kill redundant gfs2_iop_permission()
* sanitize ecryptfs_permission()
* fix remaining places where ->permission() instances might barf on new
MAY_... found in mask.
The obvious next target in that direction is permission(9)
folded fix for nfs_permission() breakage from Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index 51d0035..48a7934c 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@
return PTR_ERR(req);
memset(&inarg, 0, sizeof(inarg));
- inarg.mask = mask;
+ inarg.mask = mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC);
req->in.h.opcode = FUSE_ACCESS;
req->in.h.nodeid = get_node_id(inode);
req->in.numargs = 1;
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@
* access request is sent. Execute permission is still checked
* locally based on file mode.
*/
-static int fuse_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask, struct nameidata *nd)
+static int fuse_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
bool refreshed = false;
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@
exist. So if permissions are revoked this won't be
noticed immediately, only after the attribute
timeout has expired */
- } else if (nd && (nd->flags & (LOOKUP_ACCESS | LOOKUP_CHDIR))) {
+ } else if (mask & (MAY_ACCESS | MAY_CHDIR)) {
err = fuse_access(inode, mask);
} else if ((mask & MAY_EXEC) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
if (!(inode->i_mode & S_IXUGO)) {