ACPICA: Avoid evaluating methods too early during system resume
[ Upstream commit d3c4b6f64ad356c0d9ddbcf73fa471e6a841cc5c ]
ACPICA commit 0762982923f95eb652cf7ded27356b247c9774de
During wakeup from system-wide sleep states, acpi_get_sleep_type_data()
is called and it tries to get memory from the slab allocator in order
to evaluate a control method, but if KFENCE is enabled in the kernel,
the memory allocation attempt causes an IRQ work to be queued and a
self-IPI to be sent to the CPU running the code which requires the
memory controller to be ready, so if that happens too early in the
wakeup path, it doesn't work.
Prevent that from taking place by calling acpi_get_sleep_type_data()
for S0 upfront, when preparing to enter a given sleep state, and
saving the data obtained by it for later use during system wakeup.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214271
Reported-by: Reik Keutterling <spielkind@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Reik Keutterling <spielkind@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h
index 95eed44..2f4a3fe 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/acglobal.h
@@ -255,6 +255,8 @@
ACPI_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a);
ACPI_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b);
+ACPI_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0);
+ACPI_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b_s0);
/*****************************************************************************
*
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwesleep.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwesleep.c
index 12626d0..7f8c571 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwesleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwesleep.c
@@ -181,17 +181,13 @@
acpi_status acpi_hw_extended_wake_prep(u8 sleep_state)
{
- acpi_status status;
u8 sleep_type_value;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(hw_extended_wake_prep);
- status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S0,
- &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a,
- &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b);
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ if (acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0 != ACPI_SLEEP_TYPE_INVALID) {
sleep_type_value =
- ((acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a << ACPI_X_SLEEP_TYPE_POSITION) &
+ ((acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0 << ACPI_X_SLEEP_TYPE_POSITION) &
ACPI_X_SLEEP_TYPE_MASK);
(void)acpi_write((u64)(sleep_type_value | ACPI_X_SLEEP_ENABLE),
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
index 1fe7387..2c54d08 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@
acpi_status acpi_hw_legacy_wake_prep(u8 sleep_state)
{
- acpi_status status;
+ acpi_status status = AE_OK;
struct acpi_bit_register_info *sleep_type_reg_info;
struct acpi_bit_register_info *sleep_enable_reg_info;
u32 pm1a_control;
@@ -231,10 +231,7 @@
* This is unclear from the ACPI Spec, but it is required
* by some machines.
*/
- status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S0,
- &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a,
- &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b);
- if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ if (acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0 != ACPI_SLEEP_TYPE_INVALID) {
sleep_type_reg_info =
acpi_hw_get_bit_register_info(ACPI_BITREG_SLEEP_TYPE);
sleep_enable_reg_info =
@@ -255,9 +252,9 @@
/* Insert the SLP_TYP bits */
- pm1a_control |= (acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a <<
+ pm1a_control |= (acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0 <<
sleep_type_reg_info->bit_position);
- pm1b_control |= (acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b <<
+ pm1b_control |= (acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b_s0 <<
sleep_type_reg_info->bit_position);
/* Write the control registers and ignore any errors */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxfsleep.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxfsleep.c
index e5c095c..827c324 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxfsleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxfsleep.c
@@ -322,6 +322,13 @@
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
+ status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S0,
+ &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0,
+ &acpi_gbl_sleep_type_b_s0);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_gbl_sleep_type_a_s0 = ACPI_SLEEP_TYPE_INVALID;
+ }
+
/* Execute the _PTS method (Prepare To Sleep) */
arg_list.count = 1;