ASoC: Sort specialised mixers and muxes together
The more flexible value muxes and named mixers don't need to be sorted
differently from a power management point of view, they are different
only in terms of the control interface and not in terms of seqencing
behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index 66f07cd..9187db1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -57,15 +57,15 @@
[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 2,
[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 3,
[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 4,
- [snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 5,
- [snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 6,
- [snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 7,
- [snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 8,
- [snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 9,
- [snd_soc_dapm_adc] = 10,
- [snd_soc_dapm_hp] = 11,
- [snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 12,
- [snd_soc_dapm_post] = 13,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 4,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 5,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 6,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 6,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 7,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_adc] = 8,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_hp] = 9,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 10,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_post] = 11,
};
static int dapm_down_seq[] = {
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@
[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 3,
[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 4,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 5,
- [snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 6,
- [snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 7,
- [snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 8,
- [snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 9,
- [snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 10,
- [snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 11,
- [snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 12,
- [snd_soc_dapm_post] = 13,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 5,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 6,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 7,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 8,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 9,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 9,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 10,
+ [snd_soc_dapm_post] = 11,
};
static void pop_wait(u32 pop_time)