[PATCH] arm: add comment about max_low_pfn/max_pfn
)
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Oddly, max_low_pfn/max_pfn end up being the number of pages in the system,
rather than the maximum PFN on ARM. This doesn't seem to cause any problems,
so just add a note about it.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 41156c5..72a2b8c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@
* This doesn't seem to be used by the Linux memory
* manager any more. If we can get rid of it, we
* also get rid of some of the stuff above as well.
+ *
+ * Note: max_low_pfn and max_pfn reflect the number
+ * of _pages_ in the system, not the maximum PFN.
*/
max_low_pfn = memend_pfn - O_PFN_DOWN(PHYS_OFFSET);
max_pfn = memend_pfn - O_PFN_DOWN(PHYS_OFFSET);