sched/clock: Fixup early initialization
The code would assume sched_clock_stable() and switch to !stable
later, this switch brings a discontinuity in time.
The discontinuity on switching from stable to unstable was always
present, but previously we would set stable/unstable before
initializing TSC and usually stick to the one we start out with.
So the static_key bits brought an extra switch where there previously
wasn't one.
Things are further complicated by the fact that we cannot use
static_key as early as we usually call set_sched_clock_stable().
Fix things by tracking the stable state in a regular variable and only
set the static_key to the right state on sched_clock_init(), which is
ran right after late_time_init->tsc_init().
Before this we would not be using the TSC anyway.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Reported-by: dyoung@redhat.com
Fixes: 35af99e646c7 ("sched/clock, x86: Use a static_key for sched_clock_stable")
Cc: jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140122115918.GG3694@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
index 6bd6a67..43c2bcc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
@@ -77,35 +77,50 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
static struct static_key __sched_clock_stable = STATIC_KEY_INIT;
+static int __sched_clock_stable_early;
int sched_clock_stable(void)
{
- if (static_key_false(&__sched_clock_stable))
- return false;
- return true;
+ return static_key_false(&__sched_clock_stable);
+}
+
+static void __set_sched_clock_stable(void)
+{
+ if (!sched_clock_stable())
+ static_key_slow_inc(&__sched_clock_stable);
}
void set_sched_clock_stable(void)
{
- if (!sched_clock_stable())
- static_key_slow_dec(&__sched_clock_stable);
+ __sched_clock_stable_early = 1;
+
+ smp_mb(); /* matches sched_clock_init() */
+
+ if (!sched_clock_running)
+ return;
+
+ __set_sched_clock_stable();
}
static void __clear_sched_clock_stable(struct work_struct *work)
{
/* XXX worry about clock continuity */
if (sched_clock_stable())
- static_key_slow_inc(&__sched_clock_stable);
+ static_key_slow_dec(&__sched_clock_stable);
}
static DECLARE_WORK(sched_clock_work, __clear_sched_clock_stable);
void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
{
- if (keventd_up())
- schedule_work(&sched_clock_work);
- else
- __clear_sched_clock_stable(&sched_clock_work);
+ __sched_clock_stable_early = 0;
+
+ smp_mb(); /* matches sched_clock_init() */
+
+ if (!sched_clock_running)
+ return;
+
+ schedule_work(&sched_clock_work);
}
struct sched_clock_data {
@@ -140,6 +155,20 @@
}
sched_clock_running = 1;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that it is impossible to not do a static_key update.
+ *
+ * Either {set,clear}_sched_clock_stable() must see sched_clock_running
+ * and do the update, or we must see their __sched_clock_stable_early
+ * and do the update, or both.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* matches {set,clear}_sched_clock_stable() */
+
+ if (__sched_clock_stable_early)
+ __set_sched_clock_stable();
+ else
+ __clear_sched_clock_stable(NULL);
}
/*
@@ -340,7 +369,7 @@
*/
u64 cpu_clock(int cpu)
{
- if (static_key_false(&__sched_clock_stable))
+ if (!sched_clock_stable())
return sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
return sched_clock();
@@ -355,7 +384,7 @@
*/
u64 local_clock(void)
{
- if (static_key_false(&__sched_clock_stable))
+ if (!sched_clock_stable())
return sched_clock_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id());
return sched_clock();