Revert "rcu: Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation"
This reverts commit 616c310e83b872024271c915c1b9ab505b9efad9.
(Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation).
Testing by Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> showed that this
can result in deadlock due to invoking the scheduler when one of
the runqueue locks is held. Because this commit was simply a
performance optimization, revert it.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 5271a02..3e48994 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
*
* Caller must disable preemption.
*/
-void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
(t->rcu_read_unlock_special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) == 0) {
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
- rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda);
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_preempt_state.rda, cpu);
rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
* means that we continue to block the current grace period.
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
- rcu_preempt_qs(smp_processor_id());
+ rcu_preempt_qs(cpu);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -1002,6 +1002,14 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_force_quiescent_state);
/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
+ * CPUs being in quiescent states.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
+{
+}
+
+/*
* Because preemptible RCU does not exist, there are never any preempted
* RCU readers.
*/