[PATCH] s390: bug in setup_rt_frame
Consider return value of __put_user() when setting up a signal frame
instead of ignoring it.
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
index ae1927e4..d48cfc7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
@@ -358,8 +358,9 @@
} else {
regs->gprs[14] = (unsigned long)
frame->retcode | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
- err |= __put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
- (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode));
+ if (__put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
+ (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode)))
+ goto give_sigsegv;
}
/* Set up backchain. */