sysctl: remove "struct file *" argument of ->proc_handler
It's unused.
It isn't needed -- read or write flag is already passed and sysctl
shouldn't care about the rest.
It _was_ used in two places at arch/frv for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c b/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
index 92359cc..69eae35 100644
--- a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
@@ -42,14 +42,14 @@
* Special case of dostring for the UTS structure. This has locks
* to observe. Should this be in kernel/sys.c ????
*/
-static int proc_do_uts_string(ctl_table *table, int write, struct file *filp,
+static int proc_do_uts_string(ctl_table *table, int write,
void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
{
struct ctl_table uts_table;
int r;
memcpy(&uts_table, table, sizeof(uts_table));
uts_table.data = get_uts(table, write);
- r = proc_dostring(&uts_table,write,filp,buffer,lenp, ppos);
+ r = proc_dostring(&uts_table,write,buffer,lenp, ppos);
put_uts(table, write, uts_table.data);
return r;
}