[CPUFREQ] Disambiguate loop indexes in powernow-k7
This shouldn't have actually caused any problems
(as we return if we 'corrupt' 'i', but it's still not
very pretty. For the sake of adding another local variable,
this got cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
index 2bf4237..5d2b601 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c
@@ -452,23 +452,23 @@
pst = (struct pst_s *) p;
- for (i = 0 ; i <psb->numpst; i++) {
+ for (j=0; j<psb->numpst; j++) {
pst = (struct pst_s *) p;
number_scales = pst->numpstates;
if ((etuple == pst->cpuid) && check_fsb(pst->fsbspeed) &&
(maxfid==pst->maxfid) && (startvid==pst->startvid))
{
- dprintk ("PST:%d (@%p)\n", i, pst);
+ dprintk ("PST:%d (@%p)\n", j, pst);
dprintk (" cpuid: 0x%x fsb: %d maxFID: 0x%x startvid: 0x%x\n",
pst->cpuid, pst->fsbspeed, pst->maxfid, pst->startvid);
ret = get_ranges ((char *) pst + sizeof (struct pst_s));
return ret;
-
} else {
+ unsigned int k;
p = (char *) pst + sizeof (struct pst_s);
- for (j=0 ; j < number_scales; j++)
+ for (k=0; k<number_scales; k++)
p+=2;
}
}