tree 946f6383f420fafc89550ad2f7efbdfee441ccbb
parent 18aa9effad4adb2c1efe123af4eb24fec9f59b30
author Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 1277798833 +0200
committer Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 1277798833 +0200

workqueue: use shared worklist and pool all workers per cpu

Use gcwq->worklist instead of cwq->worklist and break the strict
association between a cwq and its worker.  All works queued on a cpu
are queued on gcwq->worklist and processed by any available worker on
the gcwq.

As there no longer is strict association between a cwq and its worker,
whether a work is executing can now only be determined by calling
[__]find_worker_executing_work().

After this change, the only association between a cwq and its worker
is that a cwq puts a worker into shared worker pool on creation and
kills it on destruction.  As all workqueues are still limited to
max_active of one, this means that there are always at least as many
workers as active works and thus there's no danger for deadlock.

The break of strong association between cwqs and workers requires
somewhat clumsy changes to current_is_keventd() and
destroy_workqueue().  Dynamic worker pool management will remove both
clumsy changes.  current_is_keventd() won't be necessary at all as the
only reason it exists is to avoid queueing a work from a work which
will be allowed just fine.  The clumsy part of destroy_workqueue() is
added because a worker can only be destroyed while idle and there's no
guarantee a worker is idle when its wq is going down.  With dynamic
pool management, workers are not associated with workqueues at all and
only idle ones will be submitted to destroy_workqueue() so the code
won't be necessary anymore.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>