[PATCH] fix kill_proc_info() vs CLONE_THREAD race
There is a window after copy_process() unlocks ->sighand.siglock
and before it adds the new thread to the thread list.
In that window __group_complete_signal(SIGKILL) will not see the
new thread yet, so this thread will start running while the whole
thread group was supposed to exit.
I beleive we have another good reason to place attach_pid(PID/TGID)
under ->sighand.siglock. We can do the same for
release_task()->__unhash_process()
de_thread()->switch_exec_pids()
After that we don't need tasklist_lock to iterate over the thread
list, and we can simplify things, see for example do_sigaction()
or sys_times().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 8e88b37..3683ce1 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1123,8 +1123,8 @@
p->real_parent = current;
p->parent = p->real_parent;
+ spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) {
- spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
/*
* Important: if an exit-all has been started then
* do not create this new thread - the whole thread
@@ -1162,8 +1162,6 @@
*/
p->it_prof_expires = jiffies_to_cputime(1);
}
-
- spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
}
/*
@@ -1189,6 +1187,7 @@
nr_threads++;
total_forks++;
+ spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
proc_fork_connector(p);
return p;