tree 19d2577a3b8dac0b15103baf32a5e2a7b9dc8c1b
parent 0b0c4c2a6974eae7b96066cb0da35b526fe58468
author Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> 1239824514 -0700
committer Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> 1243549068 -0700

davinci: Add compare register support to timer code

The Timer64p timer has 8 compare registers that can
be used to generate interrupts when the timer value
matches the compare reg's value.  They do not disturb
the timer itself.  This can be useful when there is
only one timer available for both clock events and
clocksource.

When enabled, the clocksource remains a continuous
32-bit counter but the clock event will no longer
support periodic interrupts.  Instead only oneshot
timers will be supported and implemented by setting
the compare register to the current timer value plus
the period that the clock event subsystem is requesting.

Compare registers support is enabled automatically
when the following conditions are met:
1) The same timer is being used for clock events
   and clocksource.
2) The timer is the bottom half (32 bits) of the
   64-bit timer (hardware limitation).
3) The the compare register offset and irq are
   not zero.

Since the timer is always running, there is a hardware
race in timer32_config() between reading the current
timer value, and adding the period to the current
timer value and writing the compare register.
Testing on a da830 evm board with the timer clocked
at 24 MHz and the processor clocked at 300 MHz,
showed the number of counter ticks to do this ranged
from 20-53 (~1-2.2 usecs) but usually around 41 ticks.
This includes some artifacts from collecting the
information.  So, the minimum period should be
at least 5 usecs to be safe.

There is also an non-critical lower limit that
the period should be since there is no point in
setting an event that is much shorter than the
time it takes to set the event, and get & handle
the timer interrupt for that event.  There can
also be all sorts of delays from activities
occuring elsewhere in the system (including
hardware activitis like cache & TLB management).
These are virtually impossible to quantify so a
minimum period of 50 usecs was chosen.  That will
certianly be enough to avoid the actual hardware
race but hopefully not large enough to cause
unreasonably course-grained timers.

Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>