[JFFS2] Clean up trailing white spaces
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
index 2c938d1..49127a1 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
@@ -88,12 +88,12 @@
up(&c->alloc_sem);
return -ENOSPC;
}
-
+
/* Calc possibly available space. Possibly available means that we
* don't know, if unchecked size contains obsoleted nodes, which could give us some
* more usable space. This will affect the sum only once, as gc first finishes checking
* of nodes.
- + Return -ENOSPC, if the maximum possibly available space is less or equal than
+ + Return -ENOSPC, if the maximum possibly available space is less or equal than
* blocksneeded * sector_size.
* This blocks endless gc looping on a filesystem, which is nearly full, even if
* the check above passes.
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
c->nr_free_blocks, c->nr_erasing_blocks, c->free_size, c->dirty_size, c->wasted_size, c->used_size, c->erasing_size, c->bad_size,
c->free_size + c->dirty_size + c->wasted_size + c->used_size + c->erasing_size + c->bad_size, c->flash_size));
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
-
+
ret = jffs2_garbage_collect_pass(c);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
jeb->offset, jeb->free_size, jeb->dirty_size, jeb->used_size));
list_add_tail(&jeb->list, &c->dirty_list);
}
- } else {
+ } else {
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Adding full erase block at 0x%08x to clean_list (free 0x%08x, dirty 0x%08x, used 0x%08x\n",
jeb->offset, jeb->free_size, jeb->dirty_size, jeb->used_size));
list_add_tail(&jeb->list, &c->clean_list);
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
static int jffs2_find_nextblock(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
{
struct list_head *next;
-
+
/* Take the next block off the 'free' list */
if (list_empty(&c->free_list)) {
@@ -229,8 +229,8 @@
if (!c->nr_erasing_blocks) {
/* Ouch. We're in GC, or we wouldn't have got here.
And there's no space left. At all. */
- printk(KERN_CRIT "Argh. No free space left for GC. nr_erasing_blocks is %d. nr_free_blocks is %d. (erasableempty: %s, erasingempty: %s, erasependingempty: %s)\n",
- c->nr_erasing_blocks, c->nr_free_blocks, list_empty(&c->erasable_list)?"yes":"no",
+ printk(KERN_CRIT "Argh. No free space left for GC. nr_erasing_blocks is %d. nr_free_blocks is %d. (erasableempty: %s, erasingempty: %s, erasependingempty: %s)\n",
+ c->nr_erasing_blocks, c->nr_free_blocks, list_empty(&c->erasable_list)?"yes":"no",
list_empty(&c->erasing_list)?"yes":"no", list_empty(&c->erase_pending_list)?"yes":"no");
return -ENOSPC;
}
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@
list_del(next);
c->nextblock = list_entry(next, struct jffs2_eraseblock, list);
c->nr_free_blocks--;
-
+
jffs2_sum_reset_collected(c->summary); /* reset collected summary */
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_find_nextblock(): new nextblock = 0x%08x\n", c->nextblock->offset));
@@ -354,9 +354,9 @@
if (c->cleanmarker_size && jeb->used_size == c->cleanmarker_size &&
!jeb->first_node->next_in_ino) {
- /* Only node in it beforehand was a CLEANMARKER node (we think).
+ /* Only node in it beforehand was a CLEANMARKER node (we think).
So mark it obsolete now that there's going to be another node
- in the block. This will reduce used_size to zero but We've
+ in the block. This will reduce used_size to zero but We've
already set c->nextblock so that jffs2_mark_node_obsolete()
won't try to refile it to the dirty_list.
*/
@@ -376,12 +376,12 @@
* @len: length of this physical node
* @dirty: dirty flag for new node
*
- * Should only be used to report nodes for which space has been allocated
+ * Should only be used to report nodes for which space has been allocated
* by jffs2_reserve_space.
*
* Must be called with the alloc_sem held.
*/
-
+
int jffs2_add_physical_node_ref(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *new)
{
struct jffs2_eraseblock *jeb;
@@ -488,8 +488,8 @@
if (jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c) && !jffs2_is_readonly(c) &&
!(c->flags & (JFFS2_SB_FLAG_SCANNING | JFFS2_SB_FLAG_BUILDING))) {
- /* Hm. This may confuse static lock analysis. If any of the above
- three conditions is false, we're going to return from this
+ /* Hm. This may confuse static lock analysis. If any of the above
+ three conditions is false, we're going to return from this
function without actually obliterating any nodes or freeing
any jffs2_raw_node_refs. So we don't need to stop erases from
happening, or protect against people holding an obsolete
@@ -546,17 +546,17 @@
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Wasting\n"));
addedsize = 0;
jeb->wasted_size += ref_totlen(c, jeb, ref);
- c->wasted_size += ref_totlen(c, jeb, ref);
+ c->wasted_size += ref_totlen(c, jeb, ref);
}
ref->flash_offset = ref_offset(ref) | REF_OBSOLETE;
-
+
jffs2_dbg_acct_sanity_check_nolock(c, jeb);
jffs2_dbg_acct_paranoia_check_nolock(c, jeb);
if (c->flags & JFFS2_SB_FLAG_SCANNING) {
/* Flash scanning is in progress. Don't muck about with the block
lists because they're not ready yet, and don't actually
- obliterate nodes that look obsolete. If they weren't
+ obliterate nodes that look obsolete. If they weren't
marked obsolete on the flash at the time they _became_
obsolete, there was probably a reason for that. */
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@
immediately reused, and we spread the load a bit. */
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "...and adding to erasable_list\n"));
list_add_tail(&jeb->list, &c->erasable_list);
- }
+ }
}
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Done OK\n"));
} else if (jeb == c->gcblock) {
@@ -608,8 +608,8 @@
list_add_tail(&jeb->list, &c->very_dirty_list);
} else {
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Eraseblock at 0x%08x not moved anywhere. (free 0x%08x, dirty 0x%08x, used 0x%08x)\n",
- jeb->offset, jeb->free_size, jeb->dirty_size, jeb->used_size));
- }
+ jeb->offset, jeb->free_size, jeb->dirty_size, jeb->used_size));
+ }
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
@@ -656,11 +656,11 @@
/* Nodes which have been marked obsolete no longer need to be
associated with any inode. Remove them from the per-inode list.
-
- Note we can't do this for NAND at the moment because we need
+
+ Note we can't do this for NAND at the moment because we need
obsolete dirent nodes to stay on the lists, because of the
horridness in jffs2_garbage_collect_deletion_dirent(). Also
- because we delete the inocache, and on NAND we need that to
+ because we delete the inocache, and on NAND we need that to
stay around until all the nodes are actually erased, in order
to stop us from giving the same inode number to another newly
created inode. */
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@
if (ref->next_phys && ref_obsolete(ref->next_phys) &&
!ref->next_phys->next_in_ino) {
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *n = ref->next_phys;
-
+
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
ref->__totlen += n->__totlen;
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@
jffs2_free_raw_node_ref(n);
}
-
+
/* Also merge with the previous node in the list, if there is one
and that one is obsolete */
if (ref != jeb->first_node ) {
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@
while (p->next_phys != ref)
p = p->next_phys;
-
+
if (ref_obsolete(p) && !ref->next_in_ino) {
p->__totlen += ref->__totlen;
if (jeb->last_node == ref) {
@@ -753,11 +753,11 @@
*/
dirty = c->dirty_size + c->erasing_size - c->nr_erasing_blocks * c->sector_size;
- if (c->nr_free_blocks + c->nr_erasing_blocks < c->resv_blocks_gctrigger &&
- (dirty > c->nospc_dirty_size))
+ if (c->nr_free_blocks + c->nr_erasing_blocks < c->resv_blocks_gctrigger &&
+ (dirty > c->nospc_dirty_size))
ret = 1;
- D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_thread_should_wake(): nr_free_blocks %d, nr_erasing_blocks %d, dirty_size 0x%x: %s\n",
+ D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "jffs2_thread_should_wake(): nr_free_blocks %d, nr_erasing_blocks %d, dirty_size 0x%x: %s\n",
c->nr_free_blocks, c->nr_erasing_blocks, c->dirty_size, ret?"yes":"no"));
return ret;